ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2024
Impact of Combination Rules, Level of Theory, and Potential Function on the Modeling of Gas- and Condensed-Phase Properties of Noble Gases.
Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bayesian Modeling of Polarizable Water: Lessons for Force Field Development.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2026Article
- Beyond Partitioning: Using Force Field Science to Evaluate Electrostatics Models.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2026Article
- Article
- Correction to "Impact of Combination Rules, Level of Theory, and Potential Function on the Modeling of Gas- and Condensed-Phase Properties of Noble Gases".Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2026Article
- Quantification of Anisotropy in Exchange and Dispersion Interactions: A Simple Model for Physics-Based Force Fields.The journal of physical chemistry letters · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The systems of noble gases are particularly instructive for molecular modeling due to the elemental nature of their interactions. They do not normally form bonds nor possess a (permanent) dipole moment, and the only forces determining their bonding/clustering stems from van der Waals forces─dispersion and Pauli repulsion, which can be modeled by empirical potential functions. Combination rules, that is, formulas to derive parameters for pair potentials of heterodimers from parameters of corresponding homodimers, have been studied at length for the Lennard-Jones 12-6 potentials but not in great detail for other, more accurate, potentials. In this work, we examine the usefulness of nine empirical potentials in their ability to reproduce quantum mechanical (QM) benchmark dissociation curves of noble gas dimers (He, Ne, Ar, Kr, and Xe homo- and heterodimers), and we systematically study the efficacy of different permutations of combination relations for each parameter of the potentials. Our QM benchmark comprises dissociation curves computed by several different coupled cluster implementations as well as symmetry-adapted perturbation theory. The two-parameter Lennard-Jones potentials were decisively outperformed by more elaborate potentials that sport a 25-30 times lower root-mean-square error (RMSE) when fitted to QM dissociation curves. Very good fits to the QM dissociation curves can be achieved with relatively inexpensive four- or even three-parameter potentials, for instance, the damped 14-7 potential (Halgren,
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.