Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38477573›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2024

Impact of Combination Rules, Level of Theory, and Potential Function on the Modeling of Gas- and Condensed-Phase Properties of Noble Gases.

Kristian Kříž, Paul J van Maaren, David van der Spoel

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kristian KřížDepartment of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University, Box 596, Uppsala SE-75124, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-9072-0949
Paul J van MaarenDepartment of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University, Box 596, Uppsala SE-75124, Sweden.
David van der SpoelDepartment of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University, Box 596, Uppsala SE-75124, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-7659-8526

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The systems of noble gases are particularly instructive for molecular modeling due to the elemental nature of their interactions. They do not normally form bonds nor possess a (permanent) dipole moment, and the only forces determining their bonding/clustering stems from van der Waals forces─dispersion and Pauli repulsion, which can be modeled by empirical potential functions. Combination rules, that is, formulas to derive parameters for pair potentials of heterodimers from parameters of corresponding homodimers, have been studied at length for the Lennard-Jones 12-6 potentials but not in great detail for other, more accurate, potentials. In this work, we examine the usefulness of nine empirical potentials in their ability to reproduce quantum mechanical (QM) benchmark dissociation curves of noble gas dimers (He, Ne, Ar, Kr, and Xe homo- and heterodimers), and we systematically study the efficacy of different permutations of combination relations for each parameter of the potentials. Our QM benchmark comprises dissociation curves computed by several different coupled cluster implementations as well as symmetry-adapted perturbation theory. The two-parameter Lennard-Jones potentials were decisively outperformed by more elaborate potentials that sport a 25-30 times lower root-mean-square error (RMSE) when fitted to QM dissociation curves. Very good fits to the QM dissociation curves can be achieved with relatively inexpensive four- or even three-parameter potentials, for instance, the damped 14-7 potential (Halgren,

Identifiers

PMID38477573
PMCPMC10976648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.