Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38477562›Full record

ArticleeLife2024

The push-pull intercrop

Anna L Erdei, Aneth B David, Eleni C Savvidou, Vaida Džemedžionaitė, Advaith Chakravarthy, Béla P Molnár, Teun Dekker

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
9.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. eLife · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Anna L Erdei *Department of Plant Protection Biology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Alnarp, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7819-1287
Aneth B David *Department of Plant Protection Biology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Alnarp, Sweden.
Eleni C SavvidouDepartment of Plant Protection Biology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Alnarp, Sweden.
Vaida DžemedžionaitėDepartment of Plant Protection Biology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Alnarp, Sweden.
Advaith ChakravarthyDepartment of Plant Protection Biology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Alnarp, Sweden.
Béla P MolnárDepartment of Chemical Ecology, HUN-REN Centre for Agricultural Research Plant Protection Institute, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3192-0868
Teun DekkerDepartment of Plant Protection Biology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Alnarp, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5395-6602
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences · SECentre for Agricultural Research · HUUniversity of Dar es Salaam · TZUniversity of Thessaly · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over two decades ago, an intercropping strategy was developed that received critical acclaim for synergizing food security with ecosystem resilience in smallholder farming. The push-pull strategy reportedly suppresses lepidopteran pests in maize through a combination of a repellent intercrop (push), commonly

Indexed as

EcosystemPest ControlAgricultureAnimalsLarvaSpodopteraTerpenesZea maysTerpenesDesmodiumecologyfall army wormintegrated pest managementmaizemechanical defencepush–pull intercroppingSpodoptera frugiperdaspodoptera littoralis

Identifiers

PMID38477562
PMCPMC11021049
OpenAlexW4392751209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.