Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38477291›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of general practice2024

Series: Public engagement with research. Part 2: GPs and primary care researchers working inclusively with minoritised communities in health research to help address inequalities.

Yumna Masood, Anica Alvarez Nishio, Bella Starling, Shoba Dawson, Jon Salsberg, Steven Blackburn, Esther van Vliet, Carina A C M Pittens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of general practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. How Do We Get the Public Into Public Health Research? Learnings and Key Recommendations From Initiating a Community Involvement Project Scheme.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yumna MasoodCentre for Evidence Based Medicine | Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences |, University of Oxford Radcliffe Primary Care Building, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0903-6945
Anica Alvarez NishioPublic Contributor, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9841-5682
Bella StarlingManchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9981-5637
Shoba DawsonCentre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6700-6445
Jon SalsbergUniversity of Limerick, Family Medicine Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-2010-3691
Steven BlackburnInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2629-3126
Esther van VlietAcademic Collaborative Centers, Knowledge Transfer Office, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0000-2528-1708
Carina A C M PittensAthena Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2795-4790

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Public engagement in health research is vital for addressing health disparities and promoting inclusivity among minoritised communities who often face barriers to accessing healthcare. Minoritised communities are groups, which have been made minorities by a dominant culture, race, ethnic group and/or social class and may experience health inequalities as a result. By incorporating diverse perspectives and lived experiences of minoritised communities, this approach aims to achieve contextually relevant research outcomes that reduce health inequalities and improve overall well-being. However, underrepresentation and lack of inclusivity challenges persist, necessitating the establishment of inclusive partnerships and grassroots participatory methodologies. To foster inclusive public engagement, it is important to overcome structural and cultural barriers, address socioeconomic challenges, and build trust with minoritised communities. This can be achieved by promoting a cultural shift that values inclusivity, providing comprehensive training to researchers, and collecting rigorous data on engagement demographics for transparency and accountability. Involving minoritised communities in decision-making through participatory research approaches enhances trust and yields successful outcomes. Additionally, allocating sufficient resources, collaborating in co-production, and prioritising the diverse needs and perspectives of stakeholders contribute to fostering inclusive public engagement in research. Overall, inclusive engagement practices particularly in primary care research have the potential to reduce health inequalities and cater to the unique requirements of minoritised communities, thereby creating more impactful outcomes and promoting equitable healthcare access.

Indexed as

Primary Health CareSocial ClassHumanshealth inequalitiesminoritised communitiesprimary carePublic engagement

Identifiers

PMID38477291
PMCPMC10939099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.