ArticleLa Tunisie medicale2023
Article in La Tunisie medicale, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimDescribe the performance of scientists assigned to Tunisian research structures, according to their academic disciplines, according to the Research.com platform https://research.com/), in 2023.
methodsThis is a reading focused on the productivity of scientists working in Tunisia, of the new 2023 edition of the international Research.com platform, ensuring the monitoring of 26 academic disciplines and 166880 scientists, affiliated with around three thousand research structures, and representing 1% of leading scientists in a discipline. In this platform, the ranking of researchers was based on the D-index indicator (equivalent to the h-index of a given discipline), calculated as of December 21, 2022.
resultsAround fifteen of the "Best Scientists", affiliated with Tunisian research structures, were selected by the Research.com platform (2023), belonging to eight disciplines including particularly "Chemistry", "Plant Sciences and Agronomy" and "Engineering and Technology". These researchers were attached to seven establishments including the universities of "Sfax" and "Monastir" and the "Borj Cedria - Sidi Thabet Biotechnology Center". Among these winners: Professors Moncef NASRI (Sfax, "Biology and Biochemistry", D-index=74), Chedly ABDELLY (Borj Cedria, "Agronomy", D-index=72) and Adel M. ALIMI (Sfax, "computer science», D-index=44).
conclusionIn Tunisia, the list of "Best scientists" in the Research.com ranking (2023) made it possible to identify two colleges of leaders in scientific research ("Health Sciences" and "Fundamental Sciences"), constituting priority consortia for strengthening the national strategy to support the mobility and networking of researchers, as well as the proliferation and visibility of their publications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38477193PMC11261493W4394762424What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.