Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38477109›Full record

ArticleHypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979)2024

Rationale for the Inclusion of β-Blockers Among Major Antihypertensive Drugs in the 2023 European Society of Hypertension Guidelines.

Giuseppe Mancia, Mattias Brunström, Michel Burnier, Guido Grassi, Andrzej Januszewicz, Sverre E Kjeldsen, Maria Lorenza Muiesan, Costas Thomopoulos, Konstantinos Tsioufis, Reinhold Kreutz

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 9 institutions in 8 countries.

Giuseppe ManciaUniversity Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy (G.M.).ORCID 0000-0003-0942-3176
Mattias BrunströmDepartment of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umea University, Sweden (Mattias Brunström).ORCID 0000-0002-7054-0905
Michel BurnierFaculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Switzerland (Michel Burnier).ORCID 0000-0003-1283-8487
Guido GrassiClinica Medica, University Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy (G.G.).ORCID 0000-0003-1922-6547
Andrzej JanuszewiczDepartment of Hypertension, National Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland (A.J.).
Sverre E KjeldsenInstitute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway (S.E.K.).ORCID 0000-0003-2389-0272
Maria Lorenza MuiesanUOC 2 Medicina, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Italy (M.L.M.).ORCID 0000-0002-4007-9441
Costas ThomopoulosDepartment of Cardiology, General Hospital of Athens "Laiko", Greece (C.T.).ORCID 0000-0002-8491-6029
Konstantinos TsioufisFirst Department of Cardiology, Medical School, University of Athens, Hippokration Hospital, Greece (K.T.).ORCID 0000-0002-7636-6725
Reinhold KreutzCharite-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Institute of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Germany (R.K.).ORCID 0000-0002-4818-211X
University of Milano-Bicocca · ITAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia · ITCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEHypertension Institute · USLaiko General Hospital of Athens · GRNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GROslo University Hospital · NOUmeå University · SEUniversity of Lausanne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We address the reasons why, unlike other guidelines, in the 2023 guidelines of the European Society of Hypertension β-blockers (BBs) have been regarded as major drugs for the treatment of hypertension, at the same level as diuretics, calcium channel blockers, and blockers of the renin-angiotensin system. We argue that BBs, (1) reduce blood pressure (the main factor responsible for treatment-related protection) not less than other drugs, (2) reduce pooled cardiovascular outcomes and mortality in placebo-controlled trials, in which there has also been a sizeable reduction of all major cause-specific cardiovascular outcomes, (3) have been associated with a lower global cardiovascular protection in 2 but not in several other comparison trials, in which the protective effect of BBs versus the other major drugs has been similar or even greater, with a slightly smaller or no difference of global benefit in large trial meta-analyses and a similar protective effect when comparisons extend to BBs in combination versus other drug combinations. We mention the large number of cardiac and other comorbidities for which BBs are elective drugs, and we express criticism against the exclusion of BBs because of their lower protective effect against stroke in comparison trials, because, for still uncertain reasons, differences in protection against cause-specific events (stroke, heart failure, and coronary disease) have been reported for other major drugs. These partial data cannot replace global benefits as the main deciding factor for drug choice, also because in the general hypertensive population whether and which type of event might occur is unknown.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseaseHypertensionStrokeAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAntihypertensive AgentsCalcium Channel BlockersHumansAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAntihypertensive AgentsCalcium Channel Blockersantihypertensive drugsblood pressurecoronary diseaseheart failurehypertensionstroke

Identifiers

PMID38477109
PMCPMC11025609
OpenAlexW4392741667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.