ArticleIndian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine2024
Comparison of the Recent ExPreS Score, WEANSNOW Score, and the Parsimonious HACOR Score as the Best Predictor of Weaning: An Externally Validated Prospective Observational Study.
Article in Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association between step-down disposition based on the HACOR score and mortality in ED patients treated with non-invasive ventilation.Internal and emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Predictive value of the modified ROX index for extubation failure in mechanically ventilated patients.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2025Article
- Use of ultrasonic left ventricular pressure-strain loops to predict weaning failure in critically ill patients: a pilot study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Clinical prediction scores predicting weaning failure from invasive mechanical ventilation: Role and limitations.World journal of critical care medicine · 2024Review
- Hail the HACOR as a Customized Indian Weaning Score!Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Since weaning failure is multifactorial, comprehensive weaning scores encompassing not only the respiratory component but also nonrespiratory aspects are quintessential for successful weaning prediction. Materials and methods: This was a single-center prospective observational study on 128 intensive care unit (ICU) patients undergoing spontaneous breathing trials (SBT). The extubation prediction score (ExPreS), heart rate, acidosis, consciousness, oxygenation, respiratory rate (HACOR), and weaning parameters, endotracheal tube size, arterial blood gas analysis, nutrition, secretions, neuromuscular affecting agents, obstructive airway problems and wakefulness (WEANSNOW) scores were compared for their diagnostic accuracy for successful weaning prediction. Results: Out of 128 patients, 49 (38.3%) patients had weaning failure, and 79 (61.7%) had weaning success. The patients in the weaning failure group had significantly higher APACHE II scores, WEANSNOW scores, HACOR scores, MV days, and significantly lower ExPreS scores as compared to the successful weaning group. Multivariable regression analysis showed that ExPreS score Conclusion: The parsimonious HACOR score is comparable to the ExPreS score for the prediction of weaning outcomes in critically ill patients. How to cite this article: Nayak G, Chaudhuri S, Ravindranath S, Todur P. Comparison of the Recent ExPreS Score, WEANSNOW Score, and the Parsimonious HACOR Score as the Best Predictor of Weaning: An Externally Validated Prospective Observational Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(3):273-279.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.