Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38476994›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine2024

Comparison of Glasgow Coma Scale Full Outline of UnResponsiveness and Glasgow Coma Scale: Pupils Score for Predicting Outcome in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury.

Abraham L Chawnchhim, Charu Mahajan, Indu Kapoor, Tej P Sinha, Hemanshu Prabhakar, Arvind Chaturvedi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Unveiling the Complexity of Traumatic Brain Injury: Insights from Clinical Scoring Systems.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Abraham L ChawnchhimDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Command Hospital Eastern Command, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-9365-1405
Charu MahajanDepartment of Neuroanaesthesiology and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3712-9281
Indu KapoorDepartment of Neuroanaesthesiology and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3065-4940
Tej P SinhaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3779-1446
Hemanshu PrabhakarDepartment of Neuroanaesthesiology and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7830-3296
Arvind ChaturvediDepartment of Neuroanaesthesiology and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7825-8093

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Glasgow coma scale (GCS) score is the most widely used clinical score for the initial assessment of neurologically injured patients and is also frequently used for prognostication. Other scores such as the Full Outline of UnResponsivness (FOUR) score and the Glasgow Coma Scale-Pupils (GCS-P) score have been more recently developed and are gaining popularity. This prospective cohort study was conducted to compare various scores in terms of their ability to predict outcomes at 3 months in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Materials and methods: The study was carried out between October 2020 and March 2022. Patients who presented to the hospital with TBI were assessed for inclusion. Initial coma scores were assessed in the emergency department and again after 48 hours of admission. Outcome was assessed using the extended Glasgow outcome score (GOSE) at 3 months after injury. The receiver operating curve (ROC) was plotted to correlate coma scores with the outcome, and the area under the curve (AUC) was compared. Results: A total of 355 patients with TBI were assessed for eligibility, of which 204 patients were included in the study. The AUC values to predict poor outcomes for initial GCS, FOUR, and GCS-P scores were 0.75 each. The AUC values for 48-hour coma scores were 0.88, 0.87, and 0.88, respectively. Conclusion: The GCS, FOUR, and GCS-P scores were found to be comparable in predicting the functional outcome at 3 months as assessed by GOSE. However, coma scores assessed at 48 hours were better predictors of poor outcomes at 3 months than coma scores recorded initially at the time of hospital admission. How to cite this article: Chawnchhim AL, Mahajan C, Kapoor I, Sinha TP, Prabhakar H, Chaturvedi A. Comparison of Glasgow Coma Scale Full Outline of UnResponsiveness and Glasgow Coma Scale: Pupils Score for Predicting Outcome in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(3):256-264.

Indexed as

Extended Glasgow outcome scoreFull outline of UnResponsiveness scoreGlasgow coma scale – Pupils scoreGlasgow coma scoreTraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID38476994
PMCPMC10926025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.