ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)
Increasing the sensitivity of Simoa via bead count reduction facilitates the quantification of pTau-181 in dried plasma spots.
Article in Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Increasing the sensitivity of Simoa via bead count reduction facilitates the quantification of pTau-181 in dried plasma spots.Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The exclusion of affected populations from Alzheimer's disease (AD) clinical research limits our understanding of disease heterogeneity and its impact on clinical care. While micro sampling with dried plasma spots (DPS) can promote inclusivity by enabling sample collection in remote areas, current techniques lack the sensitivity required for the quantification of phosphorylated tau at Thr181 (pTau-181) in DPS extracts. Methods: We developed an assay for pTau-181 with reduced bead count and improved bead read efficiency (BRE) using a prototype Simoa instrument. This novel assay's performance was evaluated against standard pTau-181 assays on two Simoa platforms, and DPS extracts were tested for pTau-181 quantification feasibility. Results: The novel assay quantifies pTau-181 at concentrations up to 16x lower than traditional pTau-181 assays on HD-X and SR-X platforms. DPS extracts tested with our low-bead assay were quantified considerably above the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ), indicating the suitability of this assay for future DPS extract measurements. Discussion: Implementing DPS sampling and pTau-181 quantification could increase participation from underrepresented groups in AD research. However, additional assay optimization and an in-depth study of preanalytical sample stability are essential for the transition to clinical applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.