ArticleJournal of pain research2024
Long-Term Follow-Up of Ultrasound-Guided Glossopharyngeal Nerve Block Treatment for Glossopharyngeal Neuralgia: A Retrospective Clinical Study of 43 Cases.
Article in Journal of pain research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of ultrasound-guided glossopharyngeal nerve block technique: A prospective observational study.Interventional pain medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Long-Term Follow-Up of Ultrasound-Guided Glossopharyngeal Nerve Block Treatment for Glossopharyngeal Neuralgia: A Retrospective Clinical Study of 43 Cases [Letter].Journal of pain research · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Glossopharyngeal neuralgia (GPN) is a rare chronic neuropathic pain disorder that significantly impacts quality of life. Ultrasound-guided glossopharyngeal nerve blocks (UGPNB) have gained popularity due to their various advantages. However, there have been no studies reporting the long-term outcomes of UGPNB in a larger cohort of GPN patients. Aim: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of UGPNB in patients with GPN. Methods: We reviewed the electronic medical records of patients with GPN who received UGPNB at the Department of Pain Medicine of the First Medical Center, PLA General Hospital between June 1, 2011, and June 1, 2022. The effect of UGPNB was evaluated using the Barrow Neurological Institute (BNI) scale. Improvement was defined as a reduction in pain category by comparing pain categories before and after therapy. Recovery was defined as achieving BNI I after treatment. Patients who responded to treatment but then regressed to the category before therapy were considered to have experienced pain relapse. Results: A total of 43 patients with GPN who received UGPNB were included in the analysis. At discharge, 35 (81.4%) patients experienced pain improvement after treatment, and among them, 13 (30.2%) patients achieved recovery. After discharge, 13 patients (37.1%) out of the 35 effective patients experienced pain relapse at different time intervals: 0.5, 0.7, 1, 1, 3, 3, 4, 12, 15, 36, 45, 63, and 96 months. The cumulative recurrence-free survival rates were 88.85% at month 1, 82.83% at month 3, 77.04% at month 12, 70.31% at month 36, and 54.66% at month 120. Among the 13 patients who experienced relapse, four patients received a second UGPNB treatment, and pain improved in two patients (50%). No severe adverse reactions were documented. Conclusion: UGPNB is an effective, repeatable, safe, and minimally invasive treatment for patients with GPN. It may be preferable to consider UGPNB before undergoing invasive intracranial surgery or neurodestructive methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.