Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38476818›Full record

ArticlePlant phenomics (Washington, D.C.)2024

High-Throughput Spike Detection in Greenhouse Cultivated Grain Crops with Attention Mechanisms-Based Deep Learning Models.

Sajid Ullah, Klára Panzarová, Martin Trtílek, Matej Lexa, Vojtěch Máčala, Kerstin Neumann, Thomas Altmann, Jan Hejátko, Markéta Pernisová, Evgeny Gladilin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sajid UllahMendel Centre for Plant Genomics and Proteomics, Central European Institute of Technology (CEITEC), Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Klára PanzarováPhoton Systems Instruments, spol. s r.o., Drasov, Czech Republic.
Martin TrtílekPhoton Systems Instruments, spol. s r.o., Drasov, Czech Republic.
Matej LexaFaculty of Informatics, Masaryk University, Botanicka 68a, Brno, Czech Republic.
Vojtěch MáčalaFaculty of Informatics, Masaryk University, Botanicka 68a, Brno, Czech Republic.
Kerstin NeumannLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research, Seeland OT Gatersleben, Germany.
Thomas AltmannLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research, Seeland OT Gatersleben, Germany.
Jan HejátkoMendel Centre for Plant Genomics and Proteomics, Central European Institute of Technology (CEITEC), Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Markéta PernisováMendel Centre for Plant Genomics and Proteomics, Central European Institute of Technology (CEITEC), Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Evgeny GladilinLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research, Seeland OT Gatersleben, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Detection of spikes is the first important step toward image-based quantitative assessment of crop yield. However, spikes of grain plants occupy only a tiny fraction of the image area and often emerge in the middle of the mass of plant leaves that exhibit similar colors to spike regions. Consequently, accurate detection of grain spikes renders, in general, a non-trivial task even for advanced, state-of-the-art deep neural networks (DNNs). To improve pattern detection in spikes, we propose architectural changes to Faster-RCNN (FRCNN) by reducing feature extraction layers and introducing a global attention module. The performance of our extended FRCNN-A vs. conventional FRCNN was compared on images of different European wheat cultivars, including "difficult" bushy phenotypes from 2 different phenotyping facilities and optical setups. Our experimental results show that introduced architectural adaptations in FRCNN-A helped to improve spike detection accuracy in inner regions. The mean average precision (mAP) of FRCNN and FRCNN-A on inner spikes is 76.0% and 81.0%, respectively, while on the state-of-the-art detection DNNs, Swin Transformer mAP is 83.0%. As a lightweight network, FRCNN-A is faster than FRCNN and Swin Transformer on both baseline and augmented training datasets. On the FastGAN augmented dataset, FRCNN achieved a mAP of 84.24%, FRCNN-A attained a mAP of 85.0%, and the Swin Transformer achieved a mAP of 89.45%. The increase in mAP of DNNs on the augmented datasets is proportional to the amount of the IPK original and augmented images. Overall, this study indicates a superior performance of attention mechanisms-based deep learning models in detecting small and subtle features of grain spikes.

Identifiers

PMID38476818
PMCPMC10927539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.