ReviewCureus2024
Evolving the Scope of Cardiac Point-of-Care Ultrasound in the Current Era.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk stratification for future cardiac arrest after COVID-19 vaccination.World journal of cardiology · 2025Review
- Case Report: Point of Care Ultrasound for Bedside Diagnosis of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy in the Post-anesthesia Care Unit.SN comprehensive clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has become a flexible and multifaceted diagnostic instrument in the realm of cardiac care, transforming the landscape of cardiovascular assessment. This review aims to explore the extensive scope of POCUS applications in cardiac care, highlighting its diverse utility across various medical specialties. POCUS, conducted at the patient's bedside, offers real-time insights into cardiac anatomy and function, providing a valuable adjunct to traditional diagnostic methods. In critically ill patients, POCUS has demonstrated its effectiveness in the rapid evaluation of the left and right ventricular function, identification of pericardial effusion and tamponade, assessment of volume status, and detection of valvular lesions. Its role as an adjunct to the physical examination has been particularly impactful, leading to early diagnoses and significantly influencing medical management decisions. The review also discusses the current limitations of POCUS technology. As the utilization of POCUS continues to expand across diverse medical disciplines, its ability to offer timely and accurate diagnostic information is poised to reshape the standard of care in cardiac medicine. This comprehensive review provides insights into the evolving role of POCUS in cardiac care and underscores its potential to enhance patient outcomes through rapid and informed decision-making at the point of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.