Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38476768›Full record

ArticleInfection and drug resistance2024

Effectiveness of Drip Infusion of Lascufloxacin, a Novel Fluoroquinolone Antibiotic, for Patients with Pneumonia Including Chronic Lung Disease Exacerbations and Lung Abscesses.

Daishi Shimada, Masafumi Seki

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection and drug resistance, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daishi ShimadaDivision of Infectious Diseases, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University Hospital, Sendai City, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8886-6930
Masafumi SekiDivision of Infectious Diseases, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University Hospital, Sendai City, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5414-8148
Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Lascufloxacin (LSFX), a novel fluoroquinolone antibacterial agent, has recently been used as a drip infusion for treating pneumonia, apparently with good effectiveness against various bacteria, including anaerobes, and good intrapulmonary penetration. Methods: The clinical effectiveness of LSFX was retrospectively investigated for the 55 patients admitted to our hospital with pneumonia, including chronic lung disease exacerbations and lung abscesses, from May 2021 to July 2023. Results: The median age of the 55 patients was 76.1 (34.1-93.1) years, 45 (81.8%) were male, and 48 (87.5%) patients had underlying disease. Community-acquired pneumonia was seen in 47 (85.5%) patients, including 9 (16.4%) with lung abscess, and the other 8 (14.5%) had nursing and healthcare-associated pneumonia/hospital-acquired pneumonia. Moderate pneumonia was present in 33 (61.8%) of 55 patients, and LSFX was used as a second-line treatment for 28 (50.9%) patients in whom first-line antibiotics were ineffective. The median duration of intravenous LSFX administration was 9 (2.0-49) days. Conclusion: Based on these data, intravenous administration of LSFX seems effective for bacterial pneumonia, including chronic lung disease exacerbations and lung abscesses, and it appears to have broad antimicrobial activity and good tissue penetration into the lung.

Indexed as

aspiration pneumoniaempyemafluoroquinolonelascufloxacinlung abscess

Identifiers

PMID38476768
PMCPMC10929652
OpenAlexW4392592422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.