Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38476753›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Europe2024

In-hospital mortality during the wild-type, alpha, delta, and omicron SARS-CoV-2 waves: a multinational cohort study in the EuCARE project.

Pontus Hedberg, Milosz Parczewski, Karol Serwin, Giulia Marchetti, Francesca Bai, Björn-Erik Ole Jensen, Joana P V Pereira, Francis Drobniewski, Henrik Reschreiter, Daniel Naumovas and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Pontus HedbergDepartment of Medicine Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Milosz ParczewskiDepartment of Tropical Infectious Diseases and Immune Deficiency, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland.
Karol SerwinDepartment of Tropical Infectious Diseases and Immune Deficiency, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland.
Giulia MarchettiDepartment of Health Sciences, Clinic of Infectious Diseases, ASST Santi Paolo E Carlo, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Francesca BaiDepartment of Health Sciences, Clinic of Infectious Diseases, ASST Santi Paolo E Carlo, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Björn-Erik Ole JensenDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Duesseldorf, Heinrich Heine University, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Joana P V PereiraDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Duesseldorf, Heinrich Heine University, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Francis DrobniewskiDepartment of Infectious Disease, Imperial College, London, W12 0NN, UK.
Henrik ReschreiterUniversity Hospital Dorset, Poole Hospital, Poole, Dorset, UK.
Daniel NaumovasVilnius Santaros Klinikos Biobank, Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Francesca Ceccherini-SilbersteinDepartment of Experimental Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Gibran Horemheb Rubio QuintanaresVirus Security Department, Paul Ehrlich Institute, Langen, Germany.
Matilu MwauCenter for Infectious and Parasitic Diseases Control Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Busia, Kenya.
Cristina ToscanoMicrobiology Laboratory, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental, Lisboa, Portugal.
Florian KönigInstitute for Bioinformatics and Medical Informatics and Medical Informatics (IBMI), University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Nico PfeiferInstitute for Bioinformatics and Medical Informatics and Medical Informatics (IBMI), University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Maurizio ZazziDepartment of Medical Biotechnologies, University of Siena, Italy.
Iuri FantiEuResist Network GEIE, Via Guido Guinizelli, 98/100, 00152, Roma, Italy.
Francesca IncardonaEuResist Network GEIE, Via Guido Guinizelli, 98/100, 00152, Roma, Italy.
Alessandro Cozzi-LepriCentre for Clinical Research, Epidemiology, Modelling and Evaluation (CREME) Institute for Global Health UCL, Rowland Hill St, London, NW3 2PF, UK.
Anders SönnerborgDepartment of Medicine Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Pontus NauclérDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Investigating outcomes of hospitalised COVID-19 patients throughout the pandemic is crucial to understand the impact of different SARS-CoV-2 variants. We compared 28-day in-hospital mortality of Wild-type, Alpha, Delta, and Omicron variant infections. Whether the difference in risk by variant varied by age was also evaluated. Methods: We conducted a cohort study including patients ≥18 years, hospitalised between 2020 and 02-01 and 2022-10-15 with a SARS-CoV-2 positive test, from nine countries. Variant was classified based on sequenced viruses or from national public metadata. Mortality was compared using the cumulative incidence function and subdistribution hazard ratios (SHR) adjusted for age, sex, calendar time, and comorbidities. Results were shown age-stratified due to effect measure modification ( Findings: We included 38,585 participants: 19,763 Wild-type, 6387 Alpha, 3640 Delta, and 8795 Omicron. The cumulative incidence of mortality decreased throughout the study period. Among participants ≥70 years, the adjusted SHR (95% confidence interval) for Delta vs. Omicron was 1.66 (1.29-2.13). This estimate was 1.66 (1.17-2.36) for Alpha vs. Omicron, and 1.34 (0.92-1.95) for Wild-type vs. Omicron. These were 1.21 (0.81-1.82), 1.21 (0.68-2.17), and 0.98 (0.53-1.82) among unvaccinated participants. When comparing Omicron sublineages, the aSHR for BA.1 was 1.92 (1.43-2.58) compared to BA.2 and 1.52 (1.11-2.08) compared to BA.5. Interpretation: The herein observed decrease in in-hospital mortality seems to reflect a combined effect of immunity from vaccinations and previous infections, although differences in virulence between SARS-CoV-2 variants may also have contributed. Funding: European Union's Horizon Europe Research and Innovation Programme.

Indexed as

COVID-19In-hospital mortalitySARS-CoV-2Variants of concern

Identifiers

PMID38476753
PMCPMC10928271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.