Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38476751›Full record

ReviewThe Lancet regional health. Europe2024

Future perspective for the application of predictive biomarker testing in advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer.

Vincent D de Jager, Wim Timens, Arnaud Bayle, Johan Botling, Luka Brcic, Reinhard Büttner, Maria Gabriela O Fernandes, Libor Havel, Maximilian Hochmair, Paul Hofman and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
18.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 14 institutions in 10 countries.

Vincent D de JagerDepartment of Pathology and Medical Biology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Wim TimensDepartment of Pathology and Medical Biology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Arnaud BayleOncostat U1018, Inserm, Paris-Saclay University, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Johan BotlingDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Institute of Biomedicine, Sahlgrenska Academy of University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Luka BrcicDiagnostic and Research Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Reinhard BüttnerInstitute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Maria Gabriela O FernandesPulmonology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, Porto, Portugal.
Libor HavelCharles University and Thomayer Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
Maximilian HochmairKarl Landsteiner Institute of Lung Research and Pulmonary Oncology, Klinik Floridsdorf, Vienna, Austria.
Paul HofmanIHU RespirERA, FHU OncoAge, Nice University Hospital, Côte d'Azur University, Nice, France.
Annelies JanssensDepartment of Oncology, University Hospital Antwerp, University of Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium.
Léon van KempenDepartment of Pathology, University Hospital Antwerp, University of Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium.
Izidor KernLaboratory for Cytology and Pathology, University Clinic Golnik, Golnik, Slovenia.
José Carlos MachadoInstitute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of the University of Porto (IPATIMUP), Porto, Portugal.
Katja MohorčičUniversity Clinic of Respiratory and Allergic Diseases, Golnik, Slovenia.
Sanjay PopatLung Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Trust, London, England, UK.
Aleš RyškaThe Fingerland Department of Pathology, Charles University Medical Faculty and University Hospital, Czech Republic.
Jürgen WolfLung Cancer Group Cologne, Department I for Internal Medicine and Center for Integrated Oncology Cologne/Bonn, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Ed SchuuringDepartment of Pathology and Medical Biology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Anthonie J van der WekkenDepartment of Pulmonary Diseases and Tuberculosis, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
University Medical Center Groningen · NLCharles University · CZUniversity Clinic of Pulmonary and Allergic Diseases Golnik · SIUniversity of Antwerp · BEHospital de São João · PTInserm · FRKarl Landsteiner Society · ATMedical University of Graz · ATRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversidade do Porto · PTUniversité Côte d'Azur · FRUniversity Hospital Cologne · DEUniversity of Gothenburg · SEUniversity of Tübingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For patients with advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), treatment strategies have changed significantly due to the introduction of targeted therapies and immunotherapy. In the last few years, we have seen an explosive growth of newly introduced targeted therapies in oncology and this development is expected to continue in the future. Besides primary targetable aberrations, emerging diagnostic biomarkers also include relevant co-occurring mutations and resistance mechanisms involved in disease progression, that have impact on optimal treatment management. To accommodate testing of pending biomarkers, it is necessary to establish routine large-panel next-generation sequencing (NGS) for all patients with advanced stage NSCLC. For cost-effectiveness and accessibility, it is recommended to implement predictive molecular testing using large-panel NGS in a dedicated, centralized expert laboratory within a regional oncology network. The central molecular testing center should host a regional Molecular Tumor Board and function as a hub for interpretation of rare and complex testing results and clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

Next-generation sequencingNon-small cell lung cancerPredictive biomarker testing

Identifiers

PMID38476751
PMCPMC10928270
OpenAlexW4392353739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.