Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38476742›Full record

ReviewThe Lancet regional health. Europe2024

Developments in predictive biomarker testing and targeted therapy in advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer and their application across European countries.

Vincent D de Jager, Wim Timens, Arnaud Bayle, Johan Botling, Luka Brcic, Reinhard Büttner, Maria Gabriela O Fernandes, Libor Havel, Maximilian J Hochmair, Paul Hofman and 15 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. RareJTO clinical and research reports · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Real-World Treatment Patterns and Survival in Patients withCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026
    Observational
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Vincent D de JagerDepartment of Pathology and Medical Biology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Wim TimensDepartment of Pathology and Medical Biology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Arnaud BayleOncostat U1018, Inserm, Paris-Saclay University, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Johan BotlingDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Institute of Biomedicine, Sahlgrenska Academy of University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Luka BrcicDiagnostic and Research Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Reinhard BüttnerInstitute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Maria Gabriela O FernandesPulmonology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, Porto, Portugal.
Libor HavelCharles University and Thomayer Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
Maximilian J HochmairKarl Landsteiner Institute of Lung Research and Pulmonary Oncology, Klinik Floridsdorf, Vienna, Austria.
Paul HofmanIHU RespirERA, FHU OncoAge, Nice University Hospital, Côte d'Azur University, Nice, France.
Annelies JanssensDepartment of Oncology, University Hospital Antwerp, University of Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium.
Mikael JohanssonDepartment of Radiation Sciences, Oncology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Léon van KempenDepartment of Pathology, University Hospital Antwerp, University of Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium.
Izidor KernLaboratory for Cytology and Pathology, University Clinic Golnik, Golnik, Slovenia.
Fernando Lopez-RiosHospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Research Institute Hospital 12 de Octubre (i+12), Ciberonc, Madrid, Spain.
Margreet LüchtenborgNational Disease Registration Service, NHS England, London, United Kingdom.
José Carlos MachadoInstitute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of the University of Porto (IPATIMUP), Porto, Portugal.
Katja MohorcicUniversity Clinic of Respiratory and Allergic Diseases, Golnik, Slovenia.
Luis Paz-AresHospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, H12O-CNIO Lung Cancer Clinical Research Unit, Research Institute Hospital 12 de Octubre (i+12)/Spanish National Cancer Research Center (CNIO), Ciberonc, Madrid, Spain.
Sanjay PopatLung Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Aleš RyškaThe Fingerland Department of Pathology, Charles University Medical Faculty and University Hospital, Czech Republic.
Phillipe TaniereDepartment of Histopathology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Jürgen WolfLung Cancer Group Cologne, Department I for Internal Medicine and Center for Integrated Oncology Cologne/Bonn, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Ed SchuuringDepartment of Pathology and Medical Biology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Anthonie J van der WekkenDepartment of Pulmonary Diseases and Tuberculosis, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the past two decades, the treatment of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), has undergone significant changes due to the introduction of targeted therapies and immunotherapy. These advancements have led to the need for predictive molecular tests to identify patients eligible for targeted therapy. This review provides an overview of the development and current application of targeted therapies and predictive biomarker testing in European patients with advanced stage NSCLC. Using data from eleven European countries, we conclude that recommendations for predictive testing are incorporated in national guidelines across Europe, although there are differences in their comprehensiveness. Moreover, the availability of recently EMA-approved targeted therapies varies between European countries. Unfortunately, routine assessment of national/regional molecular testing rates is limited. As a result, it remains uncertain which proportion of patients with metastatic NSCLC in Europe receive adequate predictive biomarker testing. Lastly, Molecular Tumor Boards (MTBs) for discussion of molecular test results are widely implemented, but national guidelines for their composition and functioning are lacking. The establishment of MTB guidelines can provide a framework for interpreting rare or complex mutations, facilitating appropriate treatment decision-making, and ensuring quality control.

Indexed as

EuropeNon-small cell lung cancerPredictive biomarker testingTargeted therapy

Identifiers

PMID38476742
PMCPMC10928289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.