ArticleEplasty2024
Management of 2-Stage Breast Reconstruction in Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome: A Case Report.
Article in Eplasty, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, an underreported consideration in plastic surgery: A narrative review of cases.JPRAS open · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS) refers to a group of heritable connective tissue disorders (HCTDs). Clinical hallmarks of EDS include tissue fragility, joint hypermobility, and skin hyperextensibility. One of the consequences of tissue fragility is abnormal wound healing and scar formation, posing potential challenges for surgeons treating these patients. There are limited previous reports of EDS patients undergoing mastectomy and/or breast reconstruction, and none wherein the patient had diagnoses of both vascular EDS (vEDS) and classical EDS (cEDS). Case: A 41-year-old female was referred to the plastic surgery clinic for breast reconstruction consultation after diagnosis of left breast lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS). She has a past medical history of cEDS and vEDS with associated pectus carinatum, thoracic root dilation, and hypermobile joints. After shared decision making with the patient and her breast surgeon, it was decided the patient would benefit from bilateral prophylactic mastectomies with immediate 2-stage tissue expander (TE) reconstruction. Results: The patient reported here had an unremarkable postoperative course. Her complications were limited to more than average bleeding during the first stage of reconstruction, which was easily managed with meticulous intraoperative hemostasis, and a small uncomplicated submuscular seroma 1week postoperative. She had no complications following TE to implant exchange and continues to heal well. Conclusions: This case report documents a case in which a patient with both cEDS and vEDS had an unremarkable surgical and postoperative course following bilateral prophylactic mastectomies with 2-stage TE reconstruction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38476521PMC10929067W4394745166What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.