Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38476496›Full record

Trial reportFrontiers in public health2024

Salient beliefs related to secondary distribution of COVID-19 self-test kits within social networks.

Cedric H Bien-Gund, Molly Sarbaugh, Lily Perrine, Karen Dugosh, Robert Gross, Jessica Fishman

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04797858 (Secondary Distribution of COVID-19 Self-tests vs. Referrals to Increase Test Uptake in Underserved Populations), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04797858 nacompletednot on this map

Secondary Distribution of COVID-19 Self-tests vs. Referrals to Increase Test Uptake in Underserved Populations

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PennsylvaniaRan2021 to 2023Enrolled792ConditionsCovid19ArmsCOVID-19 self-test, COVID-19 test referral
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cedric H Bien-GundDivision of Infectious Diseases, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Molly SarbaughPublic Health Management Corporation, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Lily PerrinePublic Health Management Corporation, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Karen DugoshPublic Health Management Corporation, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Robert GrossDivision of Infectious Diseases, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Jessica FishmanAnnenberg School of Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Public Health Management Corporation · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Determinants and Outcomes of Nicotine Metabolite Ratio in HIV + SmokersR01HL151292 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI ASHARE, REBECCA, GROSS, ROBERT · 2020 to 2022
$3.4M
Promoting linkage to PrEP after HIV self-testing through a peer-led intervention for MSMK23MH131468 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Cedric Howshan Bien-Gund · 2023 to 2026
$778k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL151292NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH131468
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Widespread access to testing is critical to public health efforts to control the COVID-19 pandemic. Secondary distribution of COVID-19 self-test kits, where an individual distributes test kits to others in their social networks, is a potential strategy to improve access to testing. In this qualitative study, we identified salient beliefs about distributing and accepting COVID-19 self-test kits within one's social network, as well as ordering COVID-19 self-test kits from the government. Methods: We recruited 61 participants from a randomized controlled trial (NCT04797858) in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania to elicit beliefs about (1) distributing COVID-19 self-test kits within one's social network, (2) receiving test kits from social contacts, and (3) ordering self-test kits from the government. Using validated, open-ended question stems, we identified the most common set of beliefs underlying attitudes, perceived norms (or social referents), and perceived behavioral control (or self-efficacy) toward each of these behaviors. Results: Twenty-seven out of 30 (90%) of participants who received self-test kits reported distributing the kits to social contacts. These participants described altruistic beliefs about giving others access to testing, and felt approval from family members, friends, and others in their social networks. When receiving test kits from social network contacts, participants described advantages of test kit convenience, but some voiced concern about test kit tampering and confusing instructions. Participants also described perceived logistic barriers to distributing and receiving self-test kits, such as delivering or transporting test kits, or finding time to meet. Participants who ordered test kits from the government also described increased convenience of test access, but described different logistic barriers such as delays in test kit delivery, or not receiving test kits at all. Conclusion: In comparison with government-ordered test kits, the secondary distribution of COVID-19 self-test kits raised unique concerns about test kit quality and instructions, as well as distinctive logistic barriers related to distributing self-test kits to network contacts, which were not raised for test kits ordered from the government. This study demonstrates that beliefs may vary depending on the type of testing behavior, and behavioral interventions may benefit from developing messages tailored to specific testing strategies.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsHumansSelf-TestingSocial NetworkingSurveys and QuestionnairesbeliefsCOVID-19secondary distributionself-testingsocial networks

Identifiers

PMID38476496
PMCPMC10927981
OpenAlexW4392196678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.