ArticleJournal of neurosciences in rural practice
Factors predicting outcomes of endoscopic endonasal approach in craniopharyngioma patients.
Article in Journal of neurosciences in rural practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) is commonly used for resection of craniopharyngioma (CP). Treatment outcomes of EEA for CP were related to numerous factors; however, they have been evaluated in few studies. The objective of this study is to investigate factors associated with the outcomes of CP following this operation. Materials and Methods: The records of patients with CP, who underwent EEA at our institution from January 2014 to June 2022, were retrospectively reviewed. Surgical outcomes, including the extent of resection, visual recovery, and endocrinological outcomes, were reported. Clinical and radiographic factors were analyzed for their associations with treatment outcomes using logistic regression analyzes. Results: This study cohort consisted of 28 patients with CP. Gross total resection (GTR) was achieved in 12 patients (43%). Post-operative visual status improved, stabilized, and deteriorated in 89%, 6%, and 6% of the patients, respectively. There were no patients recovered from pre-operative pituitary dysfunctions, while post-operative hypoadrenalism, hypothyroidism, and hypogonadism were found in 9 (36%), 11 (42%), and 4 (22%) patients, respectively. Post-operative permanent diabetic insipidus was found in 13 patients (50%). Greater suprasellar extension of the tumor was associated with a lower rate of GTR ( Conclusion: For EEA in CP, the extent of resection could be determined by suprasellar extension of the tumor. DM was a poor predicting factor for visual recovery, while larger tumors and Puget grade 2 had a higher risk of post-operative hypopituitarism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.