Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38476396›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2024

Hypnotherapy compared to cognitive-behavioral therapy for smoking cessation in a randomized controlled trial.

Anil Batra, Sandra Eck, Björn Riegel, Sibylle Friedrich, Kristina Fuhr, Iris Torchalla, Sven Tönnies

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01129999 (The Comparative Efficacy of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01129999 nacompletednot on this map

The Comparative Efficacy of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (CBT) and Hypnotherapy (HT) for Smoking Cessation.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital TuebingenRan2010 to 2013Enrolled360ConditionsSmoking CessationArmsCognitive-Behavioral Therapy, Hypnotherapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anil BatraDepartment for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Section for Addiction Research and Medicine, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Sandra EckDepartment for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Section for Addiction Research and Medicine, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Björn RiegelPrivate Practitioner, Hohenwestedt, Germany.
Sibylle FriedrichPrivate Practitioner, Quickborn, Germany.
Kristina FuhrDepartment for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Section for Addiction Research and Medicine, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Iris TorchallaWest Coast Resiliency Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Sven TönniesDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Universität Hamburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Worldwide, more than eight million people die each year as a result of tobacco use. A large proportion of smokers who want to quit are interested in alternative smoking cessation methods, of which hypnotherapy is the most popular. However, the efficacy of hypnotherapy as a tobacco cessation intervention cannot be considered sufficiently proven due to significant methodological limitations in the studies available to date. The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy of a hypnotherapeutic group program for smoking cessation with that of an established cognitive-behavioral group program in a randomized controlled trial. A total of 360 smokers who were willing to quit were randomly assigned to either hypnotherapy (HT) or cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) at two study sites, without regard to treatment preference. They each underwent a 6 weeks smoking cessation course (one 90 min group session per week) and were followed up at regular intervals over a 12 months period. The primary outcome variable was defined as continuous abstinence from smoking according to the Russell standard, verified by a carbon monoxide measurement at three measurement time points. Secondary outcome variables were 7 days point prevalence abstinence during the 12 months follow up and the number of cigarettes the non-quitters smoked per smoking day (smoking intensity). Generalized estimating equations were used to test treatment condition, hypnotic suggestibility, and treatment expectancy as predictors of abstinence. The two interventions did not differ significantly in the proportion of participants who remained continuously abstinent throughout the follow-up period (CBT: 15.6%, HT: 15.0%) and also regarding the 7 days abstinence rates during the 12 months follow-up (CBT: 21.2%, HT: 16.7%). However, when controlling for hypnotic suggestibility, CBT showed significantly higher 7 days abstinence rates. In terms of the continuous abstinence rates, it can be concluded that the efficacy of hypnotherapeutic methods for smoking cessation seem to be comparable to established programs such as CBT. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT01129999.

Indexed as

cognitive-behavioral therapyhypnotherapynicotine dependencesmoking cessationtobacco use

Identifiers

PMID38476396
PMCPMC10929270
OpenAlexW4392198815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.