ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2024
Evaluation of Methods for Detection and Semantic Segmentation of the Anterior Capsulotomy in Cataract Surgery Video.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial intelligence assisted simulation and surgical video analytics for ophthalmic surgery training and competence development.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- CatSkill: Artificial Intelligence-Based Metrics for the Assessment of Surgical Skill Level from Intraoperative Cataract Surgery Video Recordings.Ophthalmology scienceArticle
- A Computational Framework for Intraoperative Pupil Analysis in Cataract Surgery.Ophthalmology scienceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Background: The capsulorhexis is one of the most important and challenging maneuvers in cataract surgery. Automated analysis of the anterior capsulotomy could aid surgical training through the provision of objective feedback and guidance to trainees. Purpose: To develop and evaluate a deep learning-based system for the automated identification and semantic segmentation of the anterior capsulotomy in cataract surgery video. Methods: In this study, we established a BigCat-Capsulotomy dataset comprising 1556 video frames extracted from 190 recorded cataract surgery videos for developing and validating the capsulotomy recognition system. The proposed system involves three primary stages: video preprocessing, capsulotomy video frame classification, and capsulotomy segmentation. To thoroughly evaluate its efficacy, we examined the performance of a total of eight deep learning-based classification models and eleven segmentation models, assessing both accuracy and time consumption. Furthermore, we delved into the factors influencing system performance by deploying it across various surgical phases. Results: The ResNet-152 model employed in the classification step of the proposed capsulotomy recognition system attained strong performance with an overall Dice coefficient of 92.21%. Similarly, the UNet model with the DenseNet-169 backbone emerged as the most effective segmentation model among those investigated, achieving an overall Dice coefficient of 92.12%. Moreover, the time consumption of the system was low at 103.37 milliseconds per frame, facilitating its application in real-time scenarios. Phase-wise analysis indicated that the Phacoemulsification phase (nuclear disassembly) was the most challenging to segment (Dice coefficient of 86.02%). Conclusion: The experimental results showed that the proposed system is highly effective in intraoperative capsulotomy recognition during cataract surgery and demonstrates both high accuracy and real-time capabilities. This system holds significant potential for applications in surgical performance analysis, education, and intraoperative guidance systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.