Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38476134›Full record

ArticleCurrent zoology2024

High association strengths are linked to phenotypic similarity, including plumage color and patterns, of participants in mixed-species bird flocks of southwestern China.

Liping Zhou, Christos Mammides, Youfang Chen, Wenyi Zhou, Wenzhang Dai, Edward L Braun, Rebecca T Kimball, Yang Liu, Scott K Robinson, Eben Goodale

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current zoology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Can convergence in mixed-species flocks lead to evolutionary divergence? Evidence for and methods to test this hypothesis.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  3. Inferring the decision rules that drive co-foraging affiliations in wild mixed-species parrot groups.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Liping ZhouGuangxi Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Conservation, College of Forestry, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7750-7262
Christos MammidesNature Conservation Unit, Frederick University, 7, Yianni Frederickou Street, Pallouriotissa, Nicosia 1036, Cyprus.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1747-175X
Youfang ChenState Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7655-5761
Wenyi ZhouFlorida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 34201, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2669-3285
Wenzhang DaiSchool of Life Science and Institute of Wetland Ecology, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210000, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8292-5263
Edward L BraunDepartment of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 34201, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1643-5212
Rebecca T KimballDepartment of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 34201, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5449-5481
Yang LiuState Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, School of Ecology, Sun-Yatsen University, Guangzhou 510275, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4580-5518
Scott K RobinsonFlorida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 34201, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1321-4924
Eben GoodaleGuangxi Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Conservation, College of Forestry, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3403-2847

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Participants in mixed-species bird flocks (MSFs) have been shown to associate with species that are similar in body size, diet, and evolutionary history, suggesting that facilitation structures these assemblages. In addition, several studies have suggested that species in MSFs resemble each other in their plumage, but this question has not been systematically investigated for any MSF system. During the nonbreeding season of 2020 and 2021, we sampled 585 MSFs on 14 transects in 2 habitats of Tongbiguang Nature Reserve in western Yunnan Province, China. We performed social network analysis and the Multiple Regression Quadratic Assignment Procedure to evaluate the effect of 4 species traits (body size, overall plumage color, distinctive plumage patterns, and diet) and evolutionary history on species association strength at the whole-MSF and within-MSF levels. All 41 significant relationships showed that species with stronger associations were more similar in their various traits. Body size had the strongest effect on association strength, followed by phylogeny, plumage patterns, and plumage color; diet had the weakest effect. Our results are consistent with the hypotheses that the benefits of associating with phenotypically similar species outweigh the potential costs of interspecific competition, and that trait matching can occur in plumage characteristics, albeit more weakly than in other traits. Several explanations exist as to why similarities in plumage may occur in MSFs, including that they could reduce predators' ability to target phenotypically "odd" individuals. Whether trait matching in plumage occurs through assortative processes in ecological time or is influenced by co-evolution requires further study.

Indexed as

co-evolutioninteraction networksmixed-species animal groupsphenotypic similaritytrait convergence

Identifiers

PMID38476134
PMCPMC10926261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.