ArticleMultidisciplinary respiratory medicine2024
Use of venovenous (VV) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in near-fatal asthma: a case series.
Article in Multidisciplinary respiratory medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Status asthmaticus (SA) and near-fatal asthma (NFA) are life-threatening conditions that continue to present a management challenge for physicians. Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) has been employed as a last resort in treating these patients. Case presentation: We described six patients who were admitted to the ICU for NFA and received ECMO treatment at a high-complexity institution in Cali, Colombia, between 2015 and 2019. All patients are registered in the ELSO registry. Baseline patient characteristics, arterial blood gases (ABG), ventilatory parameters, and complications were collected as specified in the ELSO registry form. Efficacy was analyzed in terms of the improvement in respiratory acidosis, the number of ventilator-free days (VFD), and a reduction in mechanical power (MP). MP, which refers to the energy associated with the mechanical forces involved in breathing and the functioning of the respiratory system, was calculated using a mathematical formula. Safety was evaluated based on the incidence of complications. After 12 hours of ECMO, we achieved a correction of respiratory acidosis, a significant decrease in all ventilatory parameters, and a reduction in MP ranging from 52.8% to 89%. There was one mortality. Among the five surviving patients, all except one, who required a tracheostomy, had a high VFD score, with a mode of 26 days, demonstrating a reduction in ventilation time. Conclusion: Further randomized controlled trials are needed to fully understand the efficacy and safety profiles of ECMO in SA/NFA. MP is being widely used to achieve safer ventilation, and although more data is required, it appears to be a promising option for evaluating the risk of developing VILI and the success of the therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.