Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38475923›Full record

ArticleBioelectronic medicine2024

Clinical safety and feasibility of a novel implantable neuroimmune modulation device for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: initial results from the randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled RESET-RA study.

Daniel Peterson, Mark Van Poppel, Warren Boling, Perry Santos, Jason Schwalb, Howard Eisenberg, Ashesh Mehta, Heather Spader, James Botros, Frank D Vrionis and 8 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioelectronic medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04539964 (Vagus Nerve Stimulation Using the SetPoint System for Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04539964 phase3active not recruitingnot on this map

Vagus Nerve Stimulation Using the SetPoint System for Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis: The RESET-RA Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorSetPoint Medical CorporationRan2021 to 2027Enrolled243ConditionsRheumatoid ArthritisArmsImplant Procedure, Conventional Synthetic DMARD, Active stimulation, Non-active stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Emerging Therapeutics in Rheumatoid Arthritis.Current rheumatology reports · 2026
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 16 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel PetersonNeurosurgery, Austin Neurosurgeons (Arise Medical Center), Austin, TX, USA.
Mark Van PoppelNeurosurgery, Carolina Neurosurgery & Spine Associates, Charlotte, NC, USA.
Warren BolingNeurosurgery, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Perry SantosIntegris Health Baptist Medical Center, Head and Neck Surgery, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Jason SchwalbNeurosurgery, Henry Ford Medical Group, Detroit, MI, USA.
Howard EisenbergNeurosurgery, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Ashesh MehtaThe Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Neurosurgery, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Manhasset, NY, USA.
Heather SpaderNeurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
James BotrosNeurosurgery, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Frank D VrionisNeurosurgery, Marcus Neuroscience Institute, Boca Raton, FL, USA.
Andrew KoNeurosurgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
P David AdelsonNeurosurgery, Phoenix Children's Hospital, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Bradley LegaNeurological Surgery, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Peter KonradRockefeller Neuroscience Institute, Neurosurgery, West Virginia University Medicine, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Guillermo CalleProduct Development, SetPoint Medical, Valencia, CA, USA.
Fernando L ValeMedical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA.
Richard BucholzDivision of Neurological Surgery, St. Louis University, St. Louis, MO, USA.
R Mark RichardsonNeurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. Mark.Richardson@MGH.HARVARD.EDU.
Blanchette Rockefeller Neurosciences Institute · USAlta Bates Summit Medical Center · USAugusta University · USBoca Raton Regional Hospital · USCarolina Neurosurgery and Spine Associates · USFeinstein Institute for Medical Research · USFord Motor Company (United States) · USIntegris Health · USLoma Linda University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USNeurological Surgery · USSaint Louis University · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · USUniversity of New Mexico · USUniversity of Virginia · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

SetPoint Medical SetPoint Medical
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory autoimmune disease that causes persistent synovitis, bone damage, and progressive joint destruction. Neuroimmune modulation through electrical stimulation of the vagus nerve activates the inflammatory reflex and has been shown to inhibit the production and release of inflammatory cytokines and decrease clinical signs and symptoms in RA. The RESET-RA study was designed to determine the safety and efficacy of an active implantable device for treating RA.

methodsThe RESET-RA study is a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, multi-center, two-stage pivotal trial that enrolled patients with moderate-to-severe RA who were incomplete responders or intolerant to at least one biologic or targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug. A neuroimmune modulation device (SetPoint Medical, Valencia, CA) was implanted on the left cervical vagus nerve within the carotid sheath in all patients. Following post-surgical clearance, patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to active stimulation or non-active (control) stimulation for 1 min once per day. A predefined blinded interim analysis was performed in patients enrolled in the study's initial stage (Stage 1) that included demographics, enrollment rates, device implantation rates, and safety of the surgical procedure, device, and stimulation over 12 weeks of treatment.

resultsSixty patients were implanted during Stage 1 of the study. All device implant procedures were completed without intraoperative complications, infections, or surgical revisions. No unanticipated adverse events were reported during the perioperative period and at the end of 12 weeks of follow-up. No study discontinuations were due to adverse events, and no serious adverse events were related to the device or stimulation. Two serious adverse events were related to the implantation procedure: vocal cord paresis and prolonged hoarseness. These were reported in two patients and are known complications of surgical implantation procedures with vagus nerve stimulation devices. The adverse event of vocal cord paresis resolved after vocal cord augmentation injections with filler and speech therapy. The prolonged hoarseness had improved with speech therapy, but mild hoarseness persists.

conclusionsThe surgical procedures for implantation of the novel neuroimmune modulation device for the treatment of RA were safe, and the device and its use were well tolerated.

trial registrationNCT04539964; August 31, 2020.

Indexed as

Inflammatory reflexNeuroimmune modulationRheumatoid arthritisVagus nerve stimulation

Identifiers

PMID38475923
PMCPMC10935935
OpenAlexW4392886193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.