Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38475783›Full record

ArticleBMC surgery2024

Comparison of the efficacy of neuronavigation-assisted intracerebral hematoma puncture and drainage with neuroendoscopic hematoma removal in treatment of hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage.

Lei Jiang, Jinjie Tian, Chao Guo, Yi Zhang, Ming Qian, Xuejian Wang, Zhifeng Wang, Yang Chen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lei Jiang *Department of Neurosurgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu Province, China.
Jinjie Tian *Department of Neurosurgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu Province, China.
Chao GuoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu Province, China.
Yi ZhangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu Province, China. zhangyi9285@sina.com.
Ming QianDepartment of Neurosurgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu Province, China.
Xuejian WangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu Province, China.
Zhifeng WangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu Province, China.
Yang ChenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu Province, China.
Nantong University · CNSecond Affiliated Hospital of Nantong UniversityAffiliated Hospital of Nantong University · CN

Funding

Science and Technology Support Program of Nantong JC12022015Scientific Research Foundation of Nantong Health Committee MB2021026'Top Six Types of Talents' Financial Assistance of Jiangsu Province Grant WSW-199
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare neuronavigation-assisted intracerebral hematoma puncture and drainage with neuroendoscopic hematoma removal for treatment of hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage.

methodNinety-one patients with hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage admitted to our neurosurgery department from June 2022 to May 2023 were selected: 47 patients who underwent endoscopic hematoma removal with the aid of neuronavigation in observation Group A and 44 who underwent intracerebral hematoma puncture and drainage in control Group B. The duration of surgery, intraoperative bleeding, hematoma clearance rate, pre- and postoperative GCS score, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, mRS score and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups.

resultsThe duration of surgery, intraoperative bleeding and hematoma clearance were significantly lower in Group B than in Group A (p < 0.05). Conversely, no significant differences in the preoperative, 7-day postoperative, 14-day postoperative or 1-month postoperative GCS or NIHSS scores or the posthealing mRS score were observed between Groups A and B. However, the incidence of postoperative complications was significantly greater in Group B than in Group A (p < 0.05), with the most significant difference in incidence of intracranial infection (p < 0.05).

conclusionBoth neuronavigation-assisted intracerebral hematoma puncture and drainage and neuroendoscopic hematoma removal are effective at improving the outcome of patients with hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage. The disadvantage of neuronavigation is that the incidence of complications is significantly greater than that of other methods; postoperative care and prevention of complications should be strengthened in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Intracranial Hemorrhage, HypertensiveNeuroendoscopyDrainageHematomaHumansNeuronavigationParacentesisPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeHematoma evacuationHypertensive cerebral hemorrhageIntracerebral hematoma punctureNeuroendoscopyNeuronavigation

Identifiers

PMID38475783
PMCPMC10935852
OpenAlexW4392717579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.