Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38475592›Full record

ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2024

A Comparative Analysis of XGBoost and Neural Network Models for Predicting Some Tomato Fruit Quality Traits from Environmental and Meteorological Data.

Oussama M'hamdi, Sándor Takács, Gábor Palotás, Riadh Ilahy, Lajos Helyes, Zoltán Pék

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Oussama M'hamdiInstitute of Horticultural Sciences, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Páter K. Str. 1, 2100 Gödöllö, Hungary.ORCID 0009-0002-9659-2575
Sándor TakácsInstitute of Horticultural Sciences, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Páter K. Str. 1, 2100 Gödöllö, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0001-5401-7658
Gábor PalotásUniver Product Zrt, Szolnoki út 35, 6000 Kecskemét, Hungary.
Riadh IlahyLaboratory of Horticulture, National Agricultural Research Institute of Tunisia (INRAT), University of Carthage, Ariana 1004, Tunisia.ORCID 0000-0001-9405-3098
Lajos HelyesInstitute of Horticultural Sciences, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Páter K. Str. 1, 2100 Gödöllö, Hungary.
Zoltán PékInstitute of Horticultural Sciences, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Páter K. Str. 1, 2100 Gödöllö, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0001-9767-8800

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The tomato as a raw material for processing is globally important and is pivotal in dietary and agronomic research due to its nutritional, economic, and health significance. This study explored the potential of machine learning (ML) for predicting tomato quality, utilizing data from 48 cultivars and 28 locations in Hungary over 5 seasons. It focused on °Brix, lycopene content, and colour (a/b ratio) using extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) and artificial neural network (ANN) models. The results revealed that XGBoost consistently outperformed ANN, achieving high accuracy in predicting °Brix (R² = 0.98, RMSE = 0.07) and lycopene content (R² = 0.87, RMSE = 0.61), and excelling in colour prediction (a/b ratio) with a R² of 0.93 and RMSE of 0.03. ANN lagged behind particularly in colour prediction, showing a negative R² value of -0.35. Shapley additive explanation's (SHAP) summary plot analysis indicated that both models are effective in predicting °Brix and lycopene content in tomatoes, highlighting different aspects of the data. SHAP analysis highlighted the models' efficiency (especially in °Brix and lycopene predictions) and underscored the significant influence of cultivar choice and environmental factors like climate and soil. These findings emphasize the importance of selecting and fine-tuning the appropriate ML model for enhancing precision agriculture, underlining XGBoost's superiority in handling complex agronomic data for quality assessment.

Indexed as

artificial neural networkextreme gradient boostingpredictionshapley additive explanationstomato quality

Identifiers

PMID38475592
PMCPMC10934895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.