ReviewPolymers2024
An Updated Overview of Magnetic Composites for Water Decontamination.
Review in Polymers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Data-driven insights into the performance of scalable magnetic clay-based composites for pollutant removal.RSC advances · 2026Article
- Review
- Chemical tailoring of heteroatom (P, S, Si) doping of COF-PEDOT for adsorption of paracetamol: perspective from DFT studies.RSC advances · 2026Article
- A magnetically recoverable Chitosan-Based nanocomposite for simultaneous removal of tetracycline and antibiotic resistance genes from wastewater.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Graphene Oxide-Chitosan Composite for Efficient Adsorptive Removal of Cu(II), Co(II), and Ni(II) from Simulated E‑Waste Effluents.ACS omega · 2025Article
- Nanomaterials for Persistent Organic Pollutants Decontamination in Water: Mechanisms, Challenges, and Future Perspectives.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Nanostructured Aerogels for Water Decontamination: Advances, Challenges, and Future Perspectives.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Biosynthesis of trimetallic nanoparticles and their biological applications: a recent review.Archives of microbiology · 2025Review
- Fabrication and Advanced Imaging Characterization of Magnetic Aerogel-Based Thin Films for Water Decontamination.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- New 3D Vortex Microfluidic System Tested for Magnetic Core-Shell FeNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Water contamination by harmful organic and inorganic compounds seriously burdens human health and aquatic life. A series of conventional water purification methods can be employed, yet they come with certain disadvantages, including resulting sludge or solid waste, incomplete treatment process, and high costs. To overcome these limitations, attention has been drawn to nanotechnology for fabricating better-performing adsorbents for contaminant removal. In particular, magnetic nanostructures hold promise for water decontamination applications, benefiting from easy removal from aqueous solutions. In this respect, numerous researchers worldwide have reported incorporating magnetic particles into many composite materials. Therefore, this review aims to present the newest advancements in the field of magnetic composites for water decontamination, describing the appealing properties of a series of base materials and including the results of the most recent studies. In more detail, carbon-, polymer-, hydrogel-, aerogel-, silica-, clay-, biochar-, metal-organic framework-, and covalent organic framework-based magnetic composites are overviewed, which have displayed promising adsorption capacity for industrial pollutants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.