ReviewPolymers2024
A 3D-Printed Scaffold for Repairing Bone Defects.
Review in Polymers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hydrogen releasing biomaterials for bone regeneration: mechanisms, design strategies, and applications.Bioactive materials · 2027Review
- Metallic topological structures in bone repair implants: Design, properties, and biological interactions.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2026Review
- Biofunctionalization of mineralized collagen with platelet-rich plasma enhances osteogenesis in critical-sized bone defects.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Oxygen-releasing scaffolds in tissue engineering: design strategies, fabrication and regenerative applications.Regenerative biomaterials · 2026Review
- Experimental study on antler powder/chitosan/β-glycerophosphate/polyvinyl alcohol composite platelet-rich fibrin scaffold for repairing periodontal bone defects in rabbits.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Application of biomimetic approaches in the treatment of neurological disorders.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
- Enhancing Bone Scaffold Fabrication: A Comparative Study of Manual Casting and Automated 3D Bioprinting.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- Reconstruction of a large distal femoral giant cell tumor using a 3D-printed condylar support lattice metal implant and fibular grafts: a novel biomechanical and surgical approach.3D printing in medicine · 2025Article
- Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Chitosan-Modified Bone Regeneration Materials: A Systematic Review.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Innovative Approaches in Bone Tissue Engineering: Strategies for Cancer Treatment and Recovery.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Bioprinting-By-Design of Hydrogel-Based Biomaterials for In Situ Skin Tissue Engineering.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Applying 3D-Printed Porous Ti6Al4V Prostheses to Repair Osteomyelitis-Induced Partial Bone Defects of Lower Limbs: Finite Element Analysis and Clinical Outcomes.Orthopaedic surgery · 2025Article
- Biomimetic Natural Biomaterial Nanocomposite Scaffolds: A Rising Prospect for Bone Replacement.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The treatment of bone defects has always posed challenges in the field of orthopedics. Scaffolds, as a vital component of bone tissue engineering, offer significant advantages in the research and treatment of clinical bone defects. This study aims to provide an overview of how 3D printing technology is applied in the production of bone repair scaffolds. Depending on the materials used, the 3D-printed scaffolds can be classified into two types: single-component scaffolds and composite scaffolds. We have conducted a comprehensive analysis of material composition, the characteristics of 3D printing, performance, advantages, disadvantages, and applications for each scaffold type. Furthermore, based on the current research status and progress, we offer suggestions for future research in this area. In conclusion, this review acts as a valuable reference for advancing the research in the field of bone repair scaffolds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.