Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38475371›Full record

ArticlePolymers2024

Design and Optimization of 3D-Printed Variable Cross-Section I-Beams Reinforced with Continuous and Short Fibers.

Xin Zhang, Peijie Sun, Yu Zhang, Fei Wang, Yun Tu, Yunsheng Ma, Chun Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xin ZhangSchool of Aeronautics, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an 710072, China.
Peijie SunSchool of Mechanics, Civil Engineering and Architecture, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an 710072, China.
Yu ZhangSchool of Mechanics, Civil Engineering and Architecture, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an 710072, China.
Fei WangSchool of Aircraft, Xi'an Aeronautical Institute, Xi'an 710077, China.
Yun TuKey Laboratory of Pressure Systems and Safety, School of Mechanical and Power Engineering, Ministry of Education, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China.
Yunsheng MaShandong Chambroad Holding Group Co., Ltd., Binzhou 256599, China.
Chun ZhangSchool of Aeronautics, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an 710072, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 5207517Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing, China cstc2021jcyj-msxmX0194Shaanxi Provincial Natural Science Basic Research Program - General Project 2023-JC-YB-019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

By integrating fiber-reinforced composites (FRCs) with Three-dimensional (3D) printing, the flexibility of lightweight structures was promoted while eliminating the mold's limitations. The design of the I-beam configuration was performed according to the equal-strength philosophy. Then, a multi-objective optimization analysis was conducted based on the NSGA-II algorithm. 3D printing was utilized to fabricate I-beams in three kinds of configurations and seven distinct materials. The flexural properties of the primitive (P-type), the designed (D-type), and the optimized (O-type) configurations were verified via three-point bending testing at a speed of 2 mm/min. Further, by combining different reinforcements, including continuous carbon fibers (CCFs), short carbon fibers (SCFs), and short glass fibers (SGFs) and distinct matrices, including polyamides (PAs), and polylactides (PLAs), the 3D-printed I-beams were studied experimentally. The results indicate that designed and optimized I-beams exhibit a 14.46% and 30.05% increase in the stiffness-to-mass ratio and a 7.83% and 40.59% increment in the load-to-mass ratio, respectively. The CCFs and SCFs result in an outstanding accretion in the flexural properties of 3D-printed I-beams, while the accretion is 2926% and 1070% in the stiffness-to-mass ratio and 656.7% and 344.4% in the load-to-mass ratio, respectively. For the matrix, PAs are a superior choice compared to PLAs for enhancing the positive impact of reinforcements.

Indexed as

3D printingcontinuous carbon fiberequal strengthI-beamoptimization

Identifiers

PMID38475371
PMCPMC10934089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.