ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Ultra-Wideband Ranging Error Mitigation with Novel Channel Impulse Response Feature Parameters and Two-Step Non-Line-of-Sight Identification.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Topology-Stress-Based Wormhole Attack Defense for Power Wireless Sensor Networks with UWB Physical-Layer Awareness.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Comprehensive outdoor UWB dataset: Static and dynamic measurements in LOS/NLOS environments.Scientific data · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The effective identification and mitigation of non-line-of-sight (NLOS) ranging errors are essential for achieving high-precision positioning and navigation with ultra-wideband (UWB) technology in harsh indoor environments. In this paper, an efficient UWB ranging-error mitigation strategy that uses novel channel impulse response parameters based on the results of a two-step NLOS identification, composed of a decision tree and feedforward neural network, is proposed to realize indoor locations. NLOS ranging errors are classified into three types, and corresponding mitigation strategies and recall mechanisms are developed, which are also extended to partial line-of-sight (LOS) errors. Extensive experiments involving three obstacles (humans, walls, and glass) and two sites show an average NLOS identification accuracy of 95.05%, with LOS/NLOS recall rates of 95.72%/94.15%. The mitigated LOS errors are reduced by 50.4%, while the average improvement in the accuracy of the three types of NLOS ranging errors is 61.8%, reaching up to 76.84%. Overall, this method achieves a reduction in LOS and NLOS ranging errors of 25.19% and 69.85%, respectively, resulting in a 54.46% enhancement in positioning accuracy. This performance surpasses that of state-of-the-art techniques, such as the convolutional neural network (CNN), long short-term memory-extended Kalman filter (LSTM-EKF), least-squares-support vector machine (LS-SVM), and k-nearest neighbor (K-NN) algorithms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.