ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Adaptive Time-Frequency Segment Optimization for Motor Imagery Classification.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Improved filter bank common spatial pattern algorithm based on the sparrow search algorithm.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Motor imagery (MI)-based brain-computer interface (BCI) has emerged as a crucial method for rehabilitating stroke patients. However, the variability in the time-frequency distribution of MI-electroencephalography (EEG) among individuals limits the generalizability of algorithms that rely on non-customized time-frequency segments. In this study, we propose a novel method for optimizing time-frequency segments of MI-EEG using the sparrow search algorithm (SSA). Additionally, we apply a correlation-based channel selection (CCS) method that considers the correlation coefficient of features between each pair of EEG channels. Subsequently, we utilize a regularized common spatial pattern method to extract effective features. Finally, a support vector machine is employed for signal classification. The results on three BCI datasets confirmed that our algorithm achieved better accuracy (99.11% vs. 94.00% for BCI Competition III Dataset IIIa, 87.70% vs. 81.10% for Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences dataset, and 87.94% vs. 81.97% for BCI Competition IV Dataset 1) compared to algorithms with non-customized time-frequency segments. Our proposed algorithm enables adaptive optimization of EEG time-frequency segments, which is crucial for the development of clinically effective motor rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.