ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Building Flexible, Scalable, and Machine Learning-Ready Multimodal Oncology Datasets.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Diagnostic accuracy of computer-aided detection for colorectal polyps of any size, ≤ 5 mm, and 6-9 mm: a meta-analysis.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Enabling interoperability across disparate health data sources using Large Language Models.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Multimodal Wearable Biosensing Meets Multidomain AI: A Pathway to Decentralized Healthcare.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Reliable Radiologic Skeletal Muscle Area Assessment-A Biomarker for Cancer Cachexia Diagnosis.Cells · 2026Article
- Medical imaging in immunotherapy response evaluation: from RECIST to AI-driven longitudinal models, and the distinction between risk prediction and kinetic diagnosis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Characteristics of cohort data management systems (CDMS): a scoping review.BMC medical research methodology · 2025Article
- HONeYBEE: enabling scalable multimodal AI in oncology through foundation model-driven embeddings.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Self-Normalizing Multi-Omics Neural Network for Pan-Cancer Prognostication.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Reliable Radiologic Skeletal Muscle Area Assessment - A Biomarker for Cancer Cachexia Diagnosis.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Innovations in heart failure management: The role of cutting-edge biomarkers and multi-omics integration.Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology plus · 2025Review
- Robust Multimodal Fusion for Survival Prediction in Cancer Patients.Cancer informatics · 2025Article
- Mechanisms and technologies in cancer epigenetics.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
- Multimodal data integration for oncology in the era of deep neural networks: a review.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2024Review
- Vision-language models for medical report generation and visual question answering: a review.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2024Review
- Digital pathology and multimodal learning on oncology data.BJR artificial intelligence · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The advancements in data acquisition, storage, and processing techniques have resulted in the rapid growth of heterogeneous medical data. Integrating radiological scans, histopathology images, and molecular information with clinical data is essential for developing a holistic understanding of the disease and optimizing treatment. The need for integrating data from multiple sources is further pronounced in complex diseases such as cancer for enabling precision medicine and personalized treatments. This work proposes Multimodal Integration of Oncology Data System (MINDS)-a flexible, scalable, and cost-effective metadata framework for efficiently fusing disparate data from public sources such as the Cancer Research Data Commons (CRDC) into an interconnected, patient-centric framework. MINDS consolidates over 41,000 cases from across repositories while achieving a high compression ratio relative to the 3.78 PB source data size. It offers sub-5-s query response times for interactive exploration. MINDS offers an interface for exploring relationships across data types and building cohorts for developing large-scale multimodal machine learning models. By harmonizing multimodal data, MINDS aims to potentially empower researchers with greater analytical ability to uncover diagnostic and prognostic insights and enable evidence-based personalized care. MINDS tracks granular end-to-end data provenance, ensuring reproducibility and transparency. The cloud-native architecture of MINDS can handle exponential data growth in a secure, cost-optimized manner while ensuring substantial storage optimization, replication avoidance, and dynamic access capabilities. Auto-scaling, access controls, and other mechanisms guarantee pipelines' scalability and security. MINDS overcomes the limitations of existing biomedical data silos via an interoperable metadata-driven approach that represents a pivotal step toward the future of oncology data integration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.