ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Data Augmentation Techniques for Accurate Action Classification in Stroke Patients with Hemiparesis.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Enhancing Activity Recognition After Stroke: Generative Adversarial Networks for Kinematic Data Augmentation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Stroke survivors with hemiparesis require extensive home-based rehabilitation. Deep learning-based classifiers can detect actions and provide feedback based on patient data; however, this is difficult owing to data sparsity and heterogeneity. In this study, we investigate data augmentation and model training strategies to address this problem. Three transformations are tested with varying data volumes to analyze the changes in the classification performance of individual data. Moreover, the impact of transfer learning relative to a pre-trained one-dimensional convolutional neural network (Conv1D) and training with an advanced InceptionTime model are estimated with data augmentation. In Conv1D, the joint training data of non-disabled (ND) participants and double rotationally augmented data of stroke patients is observed to outperform the baseline in terms of F1-score (60.9% vs. 47.3%). Transfer learning pre-trained with ND data exhibits 60.3% accuracy, whereas joint training with InceptionTime exhibits 67.2% accuracy under the same conditions. Our results indicate that rotational augmentation is more effective for individual data with initially lower performance and subset data with smaller numbers of participants than other techniques, suggesting that joint training on rotationally augmented ND and stroke data enhances classification performance, particularly in cases with sparse data and lower initial performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.