Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38475116›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Assessing Sensor Integrity for Nuclear Waste Monitoring Using Graph Neural Networks.

Pierre Hembert, Chady Ghnatios, Julien Cotton, Francisco Chinesta

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pierre HembertPIMM Laboratory, Arts et Métiers Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), 151 Boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France.ORCID 0009-0006-5254-1388
Chady GhnatiosPIMM Laboratory, Arts et Métiers Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), 151 Boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7100-3813
Julien CottonAndra, French National Radioactive Waste Management Agency, 92298 Châtenay-Malabry, France.
Francisco ChinestaPIMM Laboratory, Arts et Métiers Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), 151 Boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRAgence Nationale pour la Gestion des Déchets Radioactifs · FR

Funding

Agence Nationale pour la Gestion des Déchets Radioactifs
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A deep geological repository for radioactive waste, such as Andra's Cigéo project, requires long-term (persistent) monitoring. To achieve this goal, data from a network of sensors are acquired. This network is subject to deterioration over time due to environmental effects (radioactivity, mechanical deterioration of the cell, etc.), and it is paramount to assess each sensor's integrity and ensure data consistency to enable the precise monitoring of the facilities. Graph neural networks (GNNs) are suitable for detecting faulty sensors in complex networks because they accurately depict physical phenomena that occur in a system and take the sensor network's local structure into consideration in the predictions. In this work, we leveraged the availability of the experimental data acquired in Andra's Underground Research Laboratory (URL) to train a graph neural network for the assessment of data integrity. The experiment considered in this work emulated the thermal loading of a high-level waste (HLW) demonstrator cell (i.e., the heating of the containment cell by nuclear waste). Using real experiment data acquired in Andra's URL in a deep geological layer was one of the novelties of this work. The used model was a GNN that inputted the temperature field from the sensors (at the current and past steps) and returned the state of each individual sensor, i.e., faulty or not. The other novelty of this work lay in the application of the GraphSAGE model which was modified with elements of the Graph Net framework to detect faulty sensors, with up to half of the sensors in the network being faulty at once. This proportion of faulty sensors was explained by the use of distributed sensors (optic fiber) and the environmental effects on the cell. The GNNs trained on the experimental data were ultimately compared against other standard classification methods (thresholding, artificial neural networks, etc.), which demonstrated their effectiveness in the assessment of data integrity.

Indexed as

classificationgraph neural networknuclear waste monitoringsensor networksensor state

Identifiers

PMID38475116
PMCPMC10934487
OpenAlexW4392295727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.