Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38474961›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Detecting Psychological Interventions Using Bilateral Electromyographic Wearable Sensors.

Yedukondala Rao Veeranki, Sergi Garcia-Retortillo, Zacharias Papadakis, Andreas Stamatis, Kwadwo Osei Appiah-Kubi, Emily Locke, Ryan McCarthy, Ahmed Ali Torad, Ahmed Mahmoud Kadry, Mostafa Ali Elwan and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Yedukondala Rao VeerankiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7904-7543
Sergi Garcia-RetortilloDepartment of Health and Exercise Science, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC 27109, USA.
Zacharias PapadakisCollege of Health and Wellness, Barry University, Miami Shores, FL 33168, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8437-8067
Andreas StamatisHealth and Sport Sciences, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9438-0558
Kwadwo Osei Appiah-KubiDepartment of Physical Therapy, Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY 13699, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6566-9758
Emily LockeDepartment of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5452-9928
Ryan McCarthyDepartment of Biology, Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY 13699, USA.
Ahmed Ali ToradDepartment of Physical Therapy, Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY 13699, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4170-6694
Ahmed Mahmoud KadryDepartment of Physical Therapy, Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY 13699, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5009-4514
Mostafa Ali ElwanDepartment of Physical Therapy, Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY 13699, USA.
Ali BoolaniDepartment of Aeronautical and Mechanical Engineering, Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY 13699, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2261-4498
Hugo F Posada-QuinteroDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4514-4772
Clarkson University · USKafrelsheikh University · EGUniversity of Connecticut · USBarry University · USBeni-Suef University · EGUniversity of Louisville · USWake Forest University · USYale University · US

Funding

U.S.A.I.D GSP-P-120, GSP-P-119, GSP-T-204
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated the impact of auditory stimuli on muscular activation patterns using wearable surface electromyography (EMG) sensors. Employing four key muscles (Sternocleidomastoid Muscle (SCM), Cervical Erector Muscle (CEM), Quadricep Muscles (QMs), and Tibialis Muscle (TM)) and time domain features, we differentiated the effects of four interventions: silence, music, positive reinforcement, and negative reinforcement. The results demonstrated distinct muscle responses to the interventions, with the SCM and CEM being the most sensitive to changes and the TM being the most active and stimulus dependent. Post hoc analyses revealed significant intervention-specific activations in the CEM and TM for specific time points and intervention pairs, suggesting dynamic modulation and time-dependent integration. Multi-feature analysis identified both statistical and Hjorth features as potent discriminators, reflecting diverse adaptations in muscle recruitment, activation intensity, control, and signal dynamics. These features hold promise as potential biomarkers for monitoring muscle function in various clinical and research applications. Finally, muscle-specific Random Forest classification achieved the highest accuracy and Area Under the ROC Curve for the TM, indicating its potential for differentiating interventions with high precision. This study paves the way for personalized neuroadaptive interventions in rehabilitation, sports science, ergonomics, and healthcare by exploiting the diverse and dynamic landscape of muscle responses to auditory stimuli.

Indexed as

Muscle ContractionWearable Electronic DevicesElectromyographyNeck MusclesPsychosocial Interventionauditory stimuliclassificationpsychological interventionssurface electromyographywearable sensors

Identifiers

PMID38474961
PMCPMC10934474
OpenAlexW4392034516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.