Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38474905›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

LiDAR Dynamic Target Detection Based on Multidimensional Features.

Aigong Xu, Jiaxin Gao, Xin Sui, Changqiang Wang, Zhengxu Shi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Aigong XuSchool of Geomatics, Liaoning Technical University, Fuxin 123000, China.
Jiaxin GaoSchool of Geomatics, Liaoning Technical University, Fuxin 123000, China.ORCID 0009-0004-0236-207X
Xin SuiSchool of Geomatics, Liaoning Technical University, Fuxin 123000, China.
Changqiang WangSchool of Geomatics, Liaoning Technical University, Fuxin 123000, China.
Zhengxu ShiSchool of Geomatics, Liaoning Technical University, Fuxin 123000, China.

Funding

Liaoning Revitalization Talents Program XLYC2002101Liaoning Revitalization Talents Program XLYC2008034National Natural Science Foundation of China 42074012
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To address the limitations of LiDAR dynamic target detection methods, which often require heuristic thresholding, indirect computational assistance, supplementary sensor data, or postdetection, we propose an innovative method based on multidimensional features. Using the differences between the positions and geometric structures of point cloud clusters scanned by the same target in adjacent frame point clouds, the motion states of the point cloud clusters are comprehensively evaluated. To enable the automatic precision pairing of point cloud clusters from adjacent frames of the same target, a double registration algorithm is proposed for point cloud cluster centroids. The iterative closest point (ICP) algorithm is employed for approximate interframe pose estimation during coarse registration. The random sample consensus (RANSAC) and four-parameter transformation algorithms are employed to obtain precise interframe pose relations during fine registration. These processes standardize the coordinate systems of adjacent point clouds and facilitate the association of point cloud clusters from the same target. Based on the paired point cloud cluster, a classification feature system is used to construct the XGBoost decision tree. To enhance the XGBoost training efficiency, a Spearman's rank correlation coefficient-bidirectional search for a dimensionality reduction algorithm is proposed to expedite the optimal classification feature subset construction. After preliminary outcomes are generated by XGBoost, a double Boyer-Moore voting-sliding window algorithm is proposed to refine the final LiDAR dynamic target detection accuracy. To validate the efficacy and efficiency of our method in LiDAR dynamic target detection, an experimental platform is established. Real-world data are collected and pertinent experiments are designed. The experimental results illustrate the soundness of our method. The LiDAR dynamic target correct detection rate is 92.41%, the static target error detection rate is 1.43%, and the detection efficiency is 0.0299 s. Our method exhibits notable advantages over open-source comparative methods, achieving highly efficient and precise LiDAR dynamic target detection.

Indexed as

Boyer–Moore votingfeature screeningICPLiDAR dynamic target detectionRANSACsliding windowSpearman’s rank correlation coefficientXGBoost

Identifiers

PMID38474905
PMCPMC10934484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.