Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38474864›Full record

ReviewNutrients2024

Complementary Feeding: Tradition, Innovation and Pitfalls.

Maria Elena Capra, Nicola Mattia Decarolis, Delia Monopoli, Serena Rosa Laudisio, Antonella Giudice, Brigida Stanyevic, Susanna Esposito, Giacomo Biasucci

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrients, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
13.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maria Elena CapraPediatrics and Neonatology Unit, Guglielmo da Saliceto Hospital, 29121 Piacenza, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0848-5228
Nicola Mattia DecarolisPediatric Clinic, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy.
Delia MonopoliPediatric Clinic, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy.
Serena Rosa LaudisioPediatrics and Neonatology Unit, Guglielmo da Saliceto Hospital, 29121 Piacenza, Italy.
Antonella GiudicePediatric Clinic, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy.
Brigida StanyevicPediatric Clinic, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy.
Susanna EspositoPediatric Clinic, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4103-2837
Giacomo BiasucciPediatrics and Neonatology Unit, Guglielmo da Saliceto Hospital, 29121 Piacenza, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7441-9248
University of Parma · ITItalian Society of Physiotherapy · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

According to WHO, "complementary feeding (CF) is the process starting when breast milk alone or infant formula alone is no longer sufficient to meet the nutritional requirements of infants, and therefore, other foods and liquids are needed, along with breast human milk or a breastmilk substitute". CF is one of the most important "critical and sensitive periods" in human life: indeed, timing and approaches to solid foods introduction in an infant's nutrition are of utmost importance as potential epigenetic factors from infancy to adulthood. CF is also deeply influenced by each country and single-family traditions, culture, and beliefs. The aim of our narrative review is to analyze traditional CF practices, including innovative and alternative ones that emerged in the last decades, such as baby-led weaning or plant-based weaning, and to evaluate their effects on the risk of developing non-communicable diseases. Moreover, we will discuss pitfalls and misunderstandings that pediatricians frequently have to face when dealing with complementary feeding. Health care professionals must not have prejudices against parents' wishes or traditions about CF; rather, they should support and educate them in case of any alternative CF choice, always pursuing the infant's adequate growth, neuro- and taste development, and the achievement of correct eating behavior as the primary goal.

Indexed as

Breast FeedingInfant FoodFeeding BehaviorFemaleHumansInfantInfant FormulaInfant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaMilk, HumanWeaningbaby-led weaningcomplementary feedingfood allergyinfantsnutrition

Identifiers

PMID38474864
PMCPMC10934571
OpenAlexW4392381357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.