ReviewNutrients2024
Obesity and Nutrigenetics Testing: New Insights.
Review in Nutrients, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Dietary Intervention in Adults with Overweight or Obesity Leads to Weight Loss Irrespective of Macronutrient Composition.Nutrients · 2024Trial
- Beyond One-Size-Fits-All: Individually Tailored Dietary Interventions in Modern Obesity Care.Nutrients · 2026Review
- Article
- Molecular basis of precision nutrition: Food components, microbiome-derived metabolites, and multi-omics modeling.Food chemistry. Molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Effects of Personalized Nutrition Education Tailored to Individual Genetic Risk Profiles on Weight Loss in Adults with Obesity: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Integrating transcriptome and proteome profiles to compare carcass and meat quality traits between Songliao and Songlei black pigs.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Nutrigenomics meets multi-omics: integrating genetic, metabolic, and microbiome data for personalized nutrition strategies.Genes & nutrition · 2025Review
- Analysis of the Perception of Nutrigenetics in Conventional Nutritional Practice: A Survey-Based Study Applied to Dietitians from Mexico.Nutrients · 2025Article
- Energy Intake-Dependent Genetic Associations with Obesity Risk: BDNF Val66Met Polymorphism and Interactions with Dietary Bioactive Compounds.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Review
- Exploring the relationship between caffeine metabolism-related CYP1A2 rs762551 polymorphism and team sport athlete status and training adaptations.Molecular biology reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundObesity results from interactions between environmental factors, lifestyle, and genetics. In this scenario, nutritional genomics and nutrigenetic tests stand out, with the promise of helping patients avoid or treat obesity. This narrative review investigates whether nutrigenetic tests may help to prevent or treat obesity. Scientific studies in PubMed Science Direct were reviewed, focusing on using nutrigenetic tests in obesity. The work showed that few studies address the use of tools in obesity. However, most of the studies listed reported their beneficial effects in weight loss. Ethical conflicts were also discussed, as in most countries, there are no regulations to standardize these tools, and there needs to be more scientific knowledge for health professionals who interpret them. International Societies, such as the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics and the Brazilian Association for the Study of Obesity and Metabolic Syndrome, do not recommend nutrigenetic tests to prevent or treat obesity, especially in isolation. Advancing nutrigenetics depends on strengthening three pillars: regulation between countries, scientific evidence with clinical validity, and professional training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.