Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38474417›Full record

ArticleCells2024

Quantification of Polystyrene Uptake by Different Cell Lines Using Fluorescence Microscopy and Label-Free Visualization of Intracellular Polystyrene Particles by Raman Microspectroscopic Imaging.

Amelie Roth, Astrid Tannert, Nadja Ziller, Simone Eiserloh, Bianca Göhrig, Rustam R Guliev, María José Gonzalez Vazquez, Max Naumann, Alexander S Mosig, Sven Stengel and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cells, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Optimizing C14120-based LNPs forMolecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Biological Effects of Micro-/Nano-Plastics in Macrophages.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Amelie RothLeibniz Institute of Photonic Technology, 07745 Jena, Germany.
Astrid TannertLeibniz Institute of Photonic Technology, 07745 Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4115-2564
Nadja ZillerOccupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Jena University Hospital, 07747 Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1548-4741
Simone EiserlohLeibniz Institute of Photonic Technology, 07745 Jena, Germany.
Bianca GöhrigOccupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Jena University Hospital, 07747 Jena, Germany.
Rustam R GulievLeibniz Institute of Photonic Technology, 07745 Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8910-4137
María José Gonzalez VazquezLeibniz Institute of Photonic Technology, 07745 Jena, Germany.ORCID 0009-0002-9648-5876
Max NaumannLeibniz Institute of Photonic Technology, 07745 Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9067-1232
Alexander S MosigInstitute of Biochemistry II, Jena University Hospital, 07747 Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5687-2444
Sven StengelDepartment of Neuropediatrics, Jena University Hospital, 07747 Jena, Germany.
Astrid R R HeutelbeckOccupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Jena University Hospital, 07747 Jena, Germany.
Ute NeugebauerLeibniz Institute of Photonic Technology, 07745 Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7593-6132

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Collaborative Research Center 1278 "PolyTarget"Federal Ministry of Education and Research CSCC, FKZ 01EO1502Federal Ministry of Education and Research FKZ: LPI-BT4 Leibniz-IPHT 13N15713, LPI-BT4 UKJ 13N15716),Freistaat Thüringen ThIMEDOP: FKZ IZN 2018 0002 and 2018 IZN 0003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Environmental pollution caused by plastic is a present problem. Polystyrene is a widely used packaging material (e.g., Styrofoam) that can be broken down into microplastics through abrasion. Once the plastic is released into the environment, it is dispersed by wind and atmospheric dust. In this study, we investigated the uptake of polystyrene particles into human cells using A549 cells as a model of the alveolar epithelial barrier, CaCo-2 cells as a model of the intestinal epithelial barrier, and THP-1 cells as a model of immune cells to simulate a possible uptake of microplastics by inhalation, oral uptake, and interaction with the cellular immune system, respectively. The uptake of fluorescence-labeled beads by the different cell types was investigated by confocal laser scanning microscopy in a semi-quantitative, concentration-dependent manner. Additionally, we used Raman spectroscopy as a complementary method for label-free qualitative detection and the visualization of polystyrene within cells. The uptake of polystyrene beads by all investigated cell types was detected, while the uptake behavior of professional phagocytes (THP-1) differed from that of adherent epithelial cells.

Indexed as

PlasticsPolystyrenesCaco-2 CellsHumansMicroplasticsMicroscopy, FluorescenceParticle SizeMicroplasticsPlasticsPolystyrenes3D Raman imagingA549 cellsairborne microplasticsCaCo-2 cellscellular updateenvironmental samplemicroplasticsTHP-1 macrophages

Identifiers

PMID38474417
PMCPMC10931371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.