Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38473935›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2024

Vagus Nerve Stimulation Modulates Inflammation in Treatment-Resistant Depression Patients: A Pilot Study.

Paul Lespérance, Véronique Desbeaumes Jodoin, David Drouin, Frédéric Racicot, Jean-Philippe Miron, Christophe Longpré-Poirier, Marie-Pierre Fournier-Gosselin, Paméla Thebault, Réjean Lapointe, Nathalie Arbour and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effect of transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation in hemodialysis patients: A randomized controlled trial.Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis : official peer-reviewed journal of the International Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy · 2026
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Observational
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Paul LespéranceDepartment of Psychiatry, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC H2X 0C1, Canada.
Véronique Desbeaumes JodoinDepartment of Psychiatry, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC H2X 0C1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9784-942X
David DrouinDepartment of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC H3T 1J4, Canada.
Frédéric RacicotDivision of Neurosurgery, CHUM, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC H2X 0C1, Canada.
Jean-Philippe MironDepartment of Psychiatry, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC H2X 0C1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5277-541X
Christophe Longpré-PoirierDepartment of Psychiatry, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC H2X 0C1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1527-0874
Marie-Pierre Fournier-GosselinDivision of Neurosurgery, CHUM, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC H2X 0C1, Canada.
Paméla ThebaultCentre de Recherche du CHUM (CRCHUM), Institut du Cancer de Montréal, Montreal, QC H2X 0A9, Canada.
Réjean LapointeDepartment of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC H3T 1J4, Canada.
Nathalie ArbourDepartment of Neurosciences, Université de Montréal and CRCHUM, Montreal, QC H2X 0A9, Canada.
Jean-François CailhierDepartment of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC H3T 1J4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1659-298X
Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal · CAUniversité de Montréal · CA

Funding

Chair Claude-Bertrand, University of Montreal 2013-A0016-0081-595
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vagal neurostimulation (VNS) is used for the treatment of epilepsy and major medical-refractory depression. VNS has neuropsychiatric functions and systemic anti-inflammatory activity. The objective of this study is to measure the clinical efficacy and impact of VNS modulation in depressive patients. Six patients with refractory depression were enrolled. Depression symptoms were assessed with the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating, and anxiety symptoms with the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale. Plasmas were harvested prospectively before the implantation of VNS (baseline) and up to 4 years or more after continuous therapy. Forty soluble molecules were measured in the plasma by multiplex assays. Following VNS, the reduction in the mean depression severity score was 59.9% and the response rate was 87%. Anxiety levels were also greatly reduced. IL-7, CXCL8, CCL2, CCL13, CCL17, CCL22, Flt-1 and VEGFc levels were significantly lowered, whereas bFGF levels were increased (

Indexed as

Depressive Disorder, Treatment-ResistantVagus Nerve StimulationDepressionHumansInflammationPilot ProjectsTreatment Outcomeblood–brain barrierinflammationmajor depressionneuromodulation

Identifiers

PMID38473935
PMCPMC10931975
OpenAlexW4392163078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.