Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38473869›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of molecular sciences2024

VEGF and Other Gene Therapies Improve Flap Survival-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Preclinical Studies.

Wiktor Paskal, Mateusz Gotowiec, Albert Stachura, Michał Kopka, Paweł Włodarski

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Advances in nucleic acid delivery strategies for diabetic wound therapy.Journal of clinical & translational endocrinology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wiktor PaskalDepartment of Methodology, Medical University of Warsaw, 1b Banacha Street, 02-091 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-3051-5446
Mateusz GotowiecDepartment of Methodology, Medical University of Warsaw, 1b Banacha Street, 02-091 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-9432-3980
Albert StachuraDepartment of Methodology, Medical University of Warsaw, 1b Banacha Street, 02-091 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-7591-9482
Michał KopkaDepartment of Methodology, Medical University of Warsaw, 1b Banacha Street, 02-091 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4557-277X
Paweł WłodarskiDepartment of Methodology, Medical University of Warsaw, 1b Banacha Street, 02-091 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-0683-1791
Medical University of Warsaw · PL

Funding

Ministry of Science and Higher Education 0075/DIA/2017/46
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surgical flaps are basic tools in reconstructive surgery. Their use may be limited by ischemia and necrosis. Few therapies address or prevent them. Genetic therapy could improve flap outcomes, but primary studies in this field present conflicting results. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to appraise the efficacy of external gene delivery to the flap for its survival in preclinical models. This review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022359982). PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched to identify studies using animal models reporting flap survival outcomes following any genetic modifications. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to calculate mean differences in flap survival with accompanying 95% CI. The risk of bias was assessed using the SYRCLE tool. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed to ascertain the robustness of primary analyses, and the evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. The initial search yielded 690 articles; 51 were eventually included, 36 of which with 1576 rats were meta-analyzed. VEGF gene delivery to different flap types significantly improved flap survival area by 15.66% (95% CI 11.80-19.52). Other interventions had smaller or less precise effects: PDGF-13.44% (95% CI 3.53-23.35); VEGF + FGF-8.64% (95% CI 6.94-10.34); HGF-5.61% (95% CI 0.43-10.78); FGF 3.84% (95% CI 1.13-6.55). Despite considerable heterogeneity, moderate risk of bias, and low quality of evidence, the efficacy of VEGF gene therapy remained significant in all sensitivity analyses. Preclinical data indicate that gene therapy is effective for increasing flap survival, but further animal studies are required for successful clinical translation.

Indexed as

Surgical FlapsVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AAnimalsGenetic TherapyGene Transfer TechniquesRatsVascular Endothelial Growth Factor Aanimal modelsgene therapygenetic vectorsregenerative medicinesurgical flaps

Identifiers

PMID38473869
PMCPMC10932385
OpenAlexW4392111190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.