Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38473341›Full record

ReviewCancers2024

Dendritic Cells in Cancer Immunology and Immunotherapy.

Laura Hato, Angel Vizcay, Iñaki Eguren, José L Pérez-Gracia, Javier Rodríguez, Jaime Gállego Pérez-Larraya, Pablo Sarobe, Susana Inogés, Ascensión López Díaz de Cerio, Marta Santisteban

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
24.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 103 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Advancements in immunotherapy for oropharyngeal cancer: Current landscape and future prospects.Biomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacky, Olomouc, Czechoslovakia · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Laura HatoImmunology, Riberalab, 03203 Alicante, Spain.
Angel VizcayMedical Oncology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9386-3654
Iñaki EgurenMedical Oncology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, Spain.
José L Pérez-GraciaMedical Oncology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4941-9075
Javier RodríguezMedical Oncology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1899-4384
Jaime Gállego Pérez-LarrayaNeurology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2969-0116
Pablo SarobeIdiSNA, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0503-7905
Susana InogésIdiSNA, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, Spain.
Ascensión López Díaz de CerioIdiSNA, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, Spain.
Marta SantistebanMedical Oncology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0625-686X
Navarre Institute of Health Research · ESClinica Universidad de Navarra · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer immunotherapy modulates the immune system, overcomes immune escape and stimulates immune defenses against tumors. Dendritic cells (DCs) are professional promoters of immune responses against tumor antigens with the outstanding ability to coordinate the innate and adaptive immune systems. Evidence suggests that there is a decrease in both the number and function of DCs in cancer patients. Therefore, they represent a strong scaffold for therapeutic interventions. DC vaccination (DCV) is safe, and the antitumoral responses induced are well established in solid tumors. Although the addition of checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) to chemotherapy has provided new options in the treatment of cancer, they have shown no clinical benefit in immune desert tumors or in those tumors with dysfunctional or exhausted T-cells. In this way, DC-based therapy has demonstrated the ability to modify the tumor microenvironment for immune enriched tumors and to potentiate systemic host immune responses as an active approach to treating cancer patients. Application of DCV in cancer seeks to obtain long-term antitumor responses through an improved T-cell priming by enhancing previous or generating de novo immune responses. To date, DCV has induced immune responses in the peripheral blood of patients without a significant clinical impact on outcome. Thus, improvements in vaccines formulations, selection of patients based on biomarkers and combinations with other antitumoral therapies are needed to enhance patient survival. In this work, we review the role of DCV in different solid tumors with their strengths and weaknesses, and we finally mention new trends to improve the efficacy of this immune strategy.

Indexed as

cancerdendritic cellimmunotherapyvaccine

Identifiers

PMID38473341
PMCPMC10930494
OpenAlexW4392232598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.