ReviewCancers2024
Diagnostic Accuracy of Transvaginal Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Detection of Myometrial Infiltration in Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrating epigenetic and metabolic indicators for non-invasive endometrial cancer triage: a machine learning approach.BMC women's health · 2026Article
- Review
- Impact of Facility Volume on Therapy and Survival for Endometrial Cancer: A Retrospective Multicenter Study.Cancers · 2026Article
- Advances in endometrial cancer screening: a comprehensive review of current methods and emerging technologies.International journal of clinical oncology · 2026Review
- HFSOF: A Hierarchical Feature Selection and Optimization Framework for Ultrasound-Based Diagnosis of Endometrial Lesions.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- A preoperative nomogram integrating transvaginal ultrasound endometrial thickness and nutritional, inflammatory, and metabolic indicators for predicting lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Impact of Body Mass Index on Robotic Surgery Outcomes in Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Cancers · 2025Article
- Article
- Therapeutic and Prognostic Relevance of Cancer Stem Cell Populations in Endometrial Cancer: A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- A Radiomic-based model to predict the depth of myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer on ultrasound images.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Comprehensive Review of Endometrial Cancer: New Molecular and FIGO Classification and Recent Treatment Changes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Endometrial Cancer: A Daily Clinical Practice Guide for Radiologists.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2025Review
- Ultrasound in endometrial cancer: evaluating the impact of pre-surgical staging.Oncology reviews · 2025Review
- Landscape of Endometrial Cancer: Molecular Mechanisms, Biomarkers, and Target Therapy.Cancers · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In endometrial cancer (EC), deep myometrial invasion (DMI) is a prognostic factor that can be evaluated by various imaging methods; however, the best method of choice is uncertain. We aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of two-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound (TVS) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the preoperative detection of DMI in patients with EC. Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane Library were systematically searched in May 2023. We included original articles that compared TVS to MRI on the same cohort of patients, with final histopathological confirmation of DMI as reference standard. Several subgroup analyses were performed. Eighteen studies comprising 1548 patients were included. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were 76.6% (95% confidence interval (CI), 70.9-81.4%) and 87.4% (95% CI, 80.6-92%) for TVS. The corresponding values for MRI were 81.1% (95% CI, 74.9-85.9%) and 83.8% (95% CI, 79.2-87.5%). No significant difference was observed (sensitivity:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.