Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38473254›Full record

ArticleCancers2024

Proton PBS Planning Techniques, Robustness Evaluation, and OAR Sparing for the Whole-Brain Part of Craniospinal Axis Irradiation.

Witold P Matysiak, Marieke C Landeweerd, Agata Bannink, Hiska L van der Weide, Charlotte L Brouwer, Johannes A Langendijk, Stefan Both, John H Maduro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Witold P MatysiakDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4552-1662
Marieke C LandeweerdDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.
Agata BanninkDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4564-7858
Hiska L van der WeideDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6734-2345
Charlotte L BrouwerDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.
Johannes A LangendijkDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1083-372X
Stefan BothDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.
John H MaduroDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2458-8702

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proton therapy is a promising modality for craniospinal irradiation (CSI), offering dosimetric advantages over conventional treatments. While significant attention has been paid to spine fields, for the brain fields, only dose reduction to the lens of the eye has been reported. Hence, the objective of this study is to assess the potential gains and feasibility of adopting different treatment planning techniques for the entire brain within the CSI target. To this end, eight previously treated CSI patients underwent retrospective replanning using various techniques: (1) intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) optimization, (2) the modification/addition of field directions, and (3) the pre-optimization removal of superficially placed spots. The target coverage robustness was evaluated and dose comparisons for lenses, cochleae, and scalp were conducted, considering potential biological dose increases. The target coverage robustness was maintained across all plans, with minor reductions when superficial spot removal was utilized. Single- and multifield optimization showed comparable target coverage robustness and organ-at-risk sparing. A significant scalp sparing was achieved in adults but only limited in pediatric cases. Superficial spot removal contributed to scalp V30 Gy reduction at the expense of lower coverage robustness in specific cases. Lens sparing benefits from multiple field directions, while cochlear sparing remains impractical. Based on the results, all investigated plan types are deemed clinically adoptable.

Indexed as

craniospinal irradiationproton therapytreatment planning

Identifiers

PMID38473254
PMCPMC10931245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.