Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38473216›Full record

ArticleCancers2024

Real-World Data on Clinical Outcomes and Treatment Management of Advanced Melanoma Patients: Single-Center Study of a Tertiary Cancer Center in Switzerland.

Ramon Staeger, Julia M Martínez-Gómez, Patrick Turko, Egle Ramelyte, Lukas Kraehenbuehl, Valerio Del Prete, Omar Hasan Ali, Mitchell P Levesque, Reinhard Dummer, Mirjam C Nägeli and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ramon StaegerFaculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, 8006 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-9283-9596
Julia M Martínez-GómezFaculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, 8006 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-5684-3707
Patrick TurkoFaculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, 8006 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-3695-8264
Egle RamelyteFaculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, 8006 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-8262-8608
Lukas KraehenbuehlFaculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, 8006 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5411-5661
Valerio Del PreteFaculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, 8006 Zurich, Switzerland.
Omar Hasan AliFaculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, 8006 Zurich, Switzerland.
Mitchell P LevesqueFaculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, 8006 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5902-9420
Reinhard DummerFaculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, 8006 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-2279-6906
Mirjam C NägeliFaculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, 8006 Zurich, Switzerland.
Joanna ManganaFaculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, 8006 Zurich, Switzerland.
University of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and BRAF/MEK inhibitors (BRAF/MEKi) have drastically changed the outcomes of advanced melanoma patients in both the resectable/adjuvant and unresectable/metastatic setting. In this follow-up analysis of real-world data, we aimed to investigate the clinical management and outcomes of advanced melanoma patients in a tertiary referral center in Switzerland approximately a decade after the introduction of ICIs and BRAF/MEKi into clinical use. Moreover, we aimed to compare the results with seminal phase 3 trials and to identify areas of high unmet clinical need.

methodsThis single-center retrospective cohort study analyzed the melanoma registry of the University Hospital Zurich, a tertiary cancer center in Switzerland, and included patients treated in the resectable/adjuvant (n = 331) or unresectable/metastatic setting (n = 375).

resultsIn the resectable setting, adjuvant anti-PD1 or BRAF/MEKi showed a 3-year relapse-free survival (RFS) of 53% and 67.6%, respectively, and the overall median RFS was 50 months. Patients with lymph node plus in-transit metastases or with distant metastases prior to commencing adjuvant treatment had a significantly reduced overall survival (OS). In 10.9% of patients, the treatment was stopped due to toxicity, which did not affect RFS/OS, unless the duration of the treatment was <3 months. Following a relapse of the disease during the first adjuvant treatment, the median progression-free survival (PFS2) was only 6.6 months; outcomes were particularly poor for relapses that were unresectable (median PFS2 3.9 months) or occurred within the first 2 months (median PFS2 2.7 months). A second adjuvant treatment for patients with resectable relapses still showed efficacy (median RFS2 43.7 months). Elevated LDH levels in patients with an unresectable relapse was correlated with a strong reduction in OS2 (HR 9.84,

conclusionOur study offers real-world insights into the clinical management, treatment patterns, and outcomes of advanced melanoma patients in both the adjuvant and unresectable setting. Early relapses in patients undergoing adjuvant treatment pose a particular challenge but these patients are generally excluded from first-line trials. The approved first-line metastatic treatments are highly effective in the real-world setting with 5-year OS rates around 50%. However, outcomes remain poor for patients with brain metastases or who fail first-line treatment.

Indexed as

adjuvant treatmentBRAF and MEK inhibitorsimmune checkpoint inhibitorsmelanomareal-world evidencetargeted therapyunresectable melanoma

Identifiers

PMID38473216
PMCPMC10930974
OpenAlexW4392017900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.