Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38473115›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2024

Evaluation of an Interprofessional Blended Learning Course Focusing on Communication within Veterinary Teams.

Sylva Agnete Charlotte Heise, Sandra Wissing, Verena Nerschbach, Ellen Preussing, Andrea Tipold, Christin Kleinsorgen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Advancing veterinary clinical communication.Journal of veterinary science · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sylva Agnete Charlotte HeiseE-Learning-Consulting, Centre for E-Learning, Didactics and Educational Research, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, 30559 Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0009-0006-0501-477X
Sandra WissingCentre for E-Learning, Didactics and Educational Research, Clinical Skills Lab, University of Veterinary Medicine, 30173 Hannover, Germany.
Verena NerschbachClinic for Small Animals, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, 30559 Hannover, Germany.
Ellen PreussingLightwings Preussing, VetAcademy, 8134 Adliswil, Switzerland.
Andrea TipoldCentre for E-Learning, Didactics and Educational Research, Clinical Skills Lab, University of Veterinary Medicine, 30173 Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9421-942X
Christin KleinsorgenE-Learning-Consulting, Centre for E-Learning, Didactics and Educational Research, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, 30559 Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1086-1691
University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation · DE

Funding

Ministry of Science and Culture of Lower Saxony T0049
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Based on the importance of communication and teamwork in veterinary practice, we explored the impact of a blended learning course designed to enhance interprofessional communication skills among veterinary students and apprentice assistants. The blended learning course design included online modules, synchronous (online) seminars, and simulation training sessions. The asynchronous online elements should complement the varied schedules of different professions and meet the individual needs of participants, especially considering the challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic. The course structure, evaluations, and outcomes were documented, showing a positive impact on knowledge gain concerning communication and self-assessment in communication skills. In the pretest, the participants scored 43.18% correct answers to a knowledge test, whereas 71.50% correct answers were given in the posttest. Some participants indicated an improvement in the self-assessment of their skills. For example, before the training only 13.64% answered the question "How prepared do you feel regarding your communication skills for entering the profession?" with "Very good" or "Good", versus 50.00% in the posttest. There were also only 22.73% of participants who agreed to having sufficient understanding of the roles of other professional groups, while in the posttest, 81.82% agreed. The evaluations highlighted positive feedback on the organization, learning environment, and overall course structure. However, challenges such as limited resources, especially time and financial constraints, influenced the implementation and ongoing development of the course. Subsequent runs of the course could gather more data to further improve the teaching of veterinary interprofessional communication. This ongoing data collection would allow continuous insights into and adjustments to the teaching methods, ensuring maximum benefit for veterinary students and apprentice assistants.

Indexed as

blended learningcommunication courseflipped classroominterprofessionalinterprofessional courseteam communicationteamwork

Identifiers

PMID38473115
PMCPMC10931423
OpenAlexW4392193547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.