Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38473015›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024

An Empirical Evaluation of a Novel Ensemble Deep Neural Network Model and Explainable AI for Accurate Segmentation and Classification of Ovarian Tumors Using CT Images.

Ashwini Kodipalli, Steven L Fernandes, Santosh Dasar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ashwini KodipalliDepartment of Artificial Intelligence and Data Science, Global Academy of Technology, Bangalore 560098, India.
Steven L FernandesDepartment of Computer Science, Design, Journalism, Creighton University, Omaha, NE 68178, USA.
Santosh DasarDepartment of Radiology, SDM College of Medical Sciences & Hospital, Shri Dharmasthala Manjunatheshwara University, Dharwad 580009, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ovarian cancer is one of the leading causes of death worldwide among the female population. Early diagnosis is crucial for patient treatment. In this work, our main objective is to accurately detect and classify ovarian cancer. To achieve this, two datasets are considered: CT scan images of patients with cancer and those without, and biomarker (clinical parameters) data from all patients. We propose an ensemble deep neural network model and an ensemble machine learning model for the automatic binary classification of ovarian CT scan images and biomarker data. The proposed model incorporates four convolutional neural network models: VGG16, ResNet 152, Inception V3, and DenseNet 101, with transformers applied for feature extraction. These extracted features are fed into our proposed ensemble multi-layer perceptron model for classification. Preprocessing and CNN tuning techniques such as hyperparameter optimization, data augmentation, and fine-tuning are utilized during model training. Our ensemble model outperforms single classifiers and machine learning algorithms, achieving a mean accuracy of 98.96%, a precision of 97.44%, and an F1-score of 98.7%. We compared these results with those obtained using features extracted by the UNet model, followed by classification with our ensemble model. The transformer demonstrated superior performance in feature extraction over the UNet, with a mean Dice score and mean Jaccard score of 0.98 and 0.97, respectively, and standard deviations of 0.04 and 0.06 for benign tumors and 0.99 and 0.98 with standard deviations of 0.01 for malignant tumors. For the biomarker data, the combination of five machine learning models-KNN, logistic regression, SVM, decision tree, and random forest-resulted in an improved accuracy of 92.8% compared to single classifiers.

Indexed as

benigncomputer-aided diagnosisLIMEmalignantmulti-model ensembleovarian cancerSHAPtransformersU-Net

Identifiers

PMID38473015
PMCPMC10930928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.