Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38472999›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer: A Literature Review.

Petar Uchikov, Usman Khalid, Krasimir Kraev, Bozhidar Hristov, Maria Kraeva, Tihomir Tenchev, Dzhevdet Chakarov, Milena Sandeva, Snezhanka Dragusheva, Daniela Taneva and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Petar UchikovDepartment of Special Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Plovdiv, 4002 Plovdiv, Bulgaria.
Usman KhalidFaculty of Medicine, Medical University of Plovdiv, 4002 Plovdiv, Bulgaria.ORCID 0009-0004-9425-2539
Krasimir KraevDepartment of Propaedeutics of Internal Diseases "Prof. Dr. Anton Mitov", Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Plovdiv, 4002 Plovdiv, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0002-1155-117X
Bozhidar HristovSection "Gastroenterology", Second Department of Internal Diseases, Medical Faculty, Medical University of Plovdiv, 4002 Plovdiv, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0002-2943-1766
Maria KraevaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical Faculty, Medical University of Plovdiv, 4002 Plovdiv, Bulgaria.
Tihomir TenchevDepartment of Special Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Plovdiv, 4002 Plovdiv, Bulgaria.
Dzhevdet ChakarovDepartment of Propaedeutics of Surgical Diseases, Section of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Plovdiv, 4002 Plovdiv, Bulgaria.
Milena SandevaDepartment of Midwifery, Faculty of Public Health, Medical University of Plovdiv, 4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria.
Snezhanka DragushevaDepartment of Nursing Care, Faculty of Public Health, Medical University of Plovdiv, 4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria.
Daniela TanevaDepartment of Nursing Care, Faculty of Public Health, Medical University of Plovdiv, 4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0002-1278-1372
Atanas BatashkiDepartment of Special Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Plovdiv, 4002 Plovdiv, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0003-2958-353X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this review is to explore the role of artificial intelligence in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer, how it impacts CRC morbidity and mortality, and why its role in clinical medicine is limited.

methodsA targeted, non-systematic review of the published literature relating to colorectal cancer diagnosis was performed with PubMed databases that were scouted to help provide a more defined understanding of the recent advances regarding artificial intelligence and their impact on colorectal-related morbidity and mortality. Articles were included if deemed relevant and including information associated with the keywords.

resultsThe advancements in artificial intelligence have been significant in facilitating an earlier diagnosis of CRC. In this review, we focused on evaluating genomic biomarkers, the integration of instruments with artificial intelligence, MR and hyperspectral imaging, and the architecture of neural networks. We found that these neural networks seem practical and yield positive results in initial testing. Furthermore, we explored the use of deep-learning-based majority voting methods, such as bag of words and PAHLI, in improving diagnostic accuracy in colorectal cancer detection. Alongside this, the autonomous and expansive learning ability of artificial intelligence, coupled with its ability to extract increasingly complex features from images or videos without human reliance, highlight its impact in the diagnostic sector. Despite this, as most of the research involves a small sample of patients, a diversification of patient data is needed to enhance cohort stratification for a more sensitive and specific neural model. We also examined the successful application of artificial intelligence in predicting microsatellite instability, showcasing its potential in stratifying patients for targeted therapies.

conclusionsSince its commencement in colorectal cancer, artificial intelligence has revealed a multitude of functionalities and augmentations in the diagnostic sector of CRC. Given its early implementation, its clinical application remains a fair way away, but with steady research dedicated to improving neural architecture and expanding its applicational range, there is hope that these advanced neural software could directly impact the early diagnosis of CRC. The true promise of artificial intelligence, extending beyond the medical sector, lies in its potential to significantly influence the future landscape of CRC's morbidity and mortality.

Indexed as

advanced neural softwareartificial intelligenceautonomous learningcolorectal cancerdiagnosis

Identifiers

PMID38472999
PMCPMC10931124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.