Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38472996›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Magnifying Networks for Histopathological Images with Billions of Pixels.

Neofytos Dimitriou, Ognjen Arandjelović, David J Harrison

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Neofytos DimitriouMaritime Digitalisation Centre, Cyprus Marine and Maritime Institute, Larnaca 6300, Cyprus.ORCID 0000-0002-2328-6502
Ognjen ArandjelovićSchool of Computer Science, University of St Andrews, St Andrews KY16 9SX, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9314-194X
David J HarrisonSchool of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews KY16 9TF, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9041-9988

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amongst the other benefits conferred by the shift from traditional to digital pathology is the potential to use machine learning for diagnosis, prognosis, and personalization. A major challenge in the realization of this potential emerges from the extremely large size of digitized images, which are often in excess of 100,000 × 100,000 pixels. In this paper, we tackle this challenge head-on by diverging from the existing approaches in the literature-which rely on the splitting of the original images into small patches-and introducing magnifying networks (MagNets). By using an attention mechanism, MagNets identify the regions of the gigapixel image that benefit from an analysis on a finer scale. This process is repeated, resulting in an attention-driven coarse-to-fine analysis of only a small portion of the information contained in the original whole-slide images. Importantly, this is achieved using minimal ground truth annotation, namely, using only global, slide-level labels. The results from our tests on the publicly available Camelyon16 and Camelyon17 datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of MagNets-as well as the proposed optimization framework-in the task of whole-slide image classification. Importantly, MagNets process at least five times fewer patches from each whole-slide image than any of the existing end-to-end approaches.

Indexed as

deep learningdigital pathologygigapixel imageshistologyhistopathologyprecision medicinetissue heterogeneitywhole slide image

Identifiers

PMID38472996
PMCPMC10930771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.