Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38472958›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024

The Modified Ultrasound-Assisted Method: A Study of the Correlation between Magnetic Resonance Imaging and the Ultrasound-Assisted Evaluation of the Critical Shoulder Angle.

Christian T Schamberger, Tobias Grossner, Christian Fischer, Sebastian Findeisen, Thomas Ferbert, Arnold J Suda, Gerhard Schmidmaier, Stephan Stein

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Christian T SchambergerClinic for Trauma- and Reconstructive Surgery, University Clinic Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Tobias GrossnerClinic for Trauma- and Reconstructive Surgery, University Clinic Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8953-9384
Christian FischerARCUS Clinic, 75179 Pforzheim, Germany.
Sebastian FindeisenClinic for Trauma- and Reconstructive Surgery, University Clinic Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Thomas FerbertClinic for Trauma- and Reconstructive Surgery, University Clinic Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Arnold J SudaDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, AUVA Trauma Center Salzburg, 5010 Salzburg, Austria.
Gerhard SchmidmaierClinic for Trauma- and Reconstructive Surgery, University Clinic Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Stephan SteinClinic for Trauma- and Reconstructive Surgery, University Clinic Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Heidelberg University · DEARCUS Sports Clinic · DEUnfallkrankenhaus Salzburg · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn increased or decreased critical shoulder angle (CSA) is a known risk factor for osteoarthritis, lesions, and re-ruptures in the rotator cuff. A CSA greater than 35° correlates with degenerative rotator cuff tears, while a CSA of less than 30° correlates with osteoarthritis in the glenohumeral joint. The diagnostic gold standard for its determination is X-ray or MRI.

objectivesThe primary objective of this research was to assess the viability of utilizing sonography imaging as a diagnostic tool to determine the modified critical shoulder angle (mCSA). This study aimed to investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of sonographic techniques in accurately diagnosing CSA compared to MRI. STUDY DESIGN AND

methodsA cohort study was carried out (level of evidence 3). The CSA (MRI) and the mCSA (ultrasound) were assessed retrospectively by two independent board-certified investigators in 109 patients with shoulder pain by MRI and musculoskeletal sonography. The CSA in the MRI dataset was determined using routine protocols and then compared to the values assessed using the modified sonography-assisted method (mCSA). Both results were analyzed with linear regression to determine a possible correlation. All investigations were performed by a DEGUM (German Society for Medical Ultrasound)-certified specialist in musculoskeletal sonography.

resultsA total of 112 patients were included in this study, namely 40 female patients and 72 male patients with a mean age of 54.7 years at the time of the investigation. The mean CSA in MRI was 31.5° ± 3.899, and the mCSA in sonography was 30.1° ± 4.753. The inter- and intraobserver reliability for the CSA was factual with values of 0.993 and 0.967. The inter- and intraobserver reliability for mCSA was factual as well, with values of 0.989 and 0.948. The ANOVA analysis did not reveal a significant difference between the CSA and the mCSA values, and linear regression determined the R

conclusionsDiagnosing the mCSA using sonography is a safe and valid method. No statistically significant differences between the results in MRI and sonography could be seen. Although this is a retrospective, single-center study including only Caucasian mid-Europeans, and with the known limitations of ultrasound imaging, it nevertheless shows that sonography can be used as a simple, cheap, and fast technique to assess a modified CSA, which shows very good correlation with the standard CSA without losing the diagnostic quality.

Indexed as

critical shoulder angleimpingementMRIultrasound

Identifiers

PMID38472958
PMCPMC10931389
OpenAlexW4392111199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.