Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38472938›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Comparative Study of Eclipse and RayStation Multi-Criteria Optimization-Based Prostate Radiotherapy Treatment Planning Quality.

John Y K Wong, Vincent W S Leung, Rico H M Hung, Curtise K C Ng

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

John Y K WongDepartment of Health Technology and Informatics, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Vincent W S LeungDepartment of Health Technology and Informatics, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6150-0920
Rico H M HungDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1944-4640
Curtise K C NgCurtin Medical School, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA 6845, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5849-5857

Funding

Government of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Health and Medical Research Fund Research Fellowshio Scheme 06200137The Hong kong Polytechnic University Collaborative Scheme for HTI and PYNEH Clinical Oncology 2022 P0045657The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Large Equipment Fund for Teaching 2020/21 HTI-4
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multi-criteria optimization (MCO) function has been available on commercial radiotherapy (RT) treatment planning systems to improve plan quality; however, no study has compared Eclipse and RayStation MCO functions for prostate RT planning. The purpose of this study was to compare prostate RT MCO plan qualities in terms of discrepancies between Pareto optimal and final deliverable plans, and dosimetric impact of final deliverable plans. In total, 25 computed tomography datasets of prostate cancer patients were used for Eclipse (version 16.1) and RayStation (version 12A) MCO-based plannings with doses received by 98% of planning target volume having 76 Gy prescription (PTV

Indexed as

cancerGleason scoreorgans at riskPareto frontPareto surfaceprostate-specific antigenradiation therapytarget volumetoxicitytrade-off

Identifiers

PMID38472938
PMCPMC10931516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.